meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Food, We Need To Talk

How to Spot a B.S. Study

Food, We Need To Talk

Juna Gjata

Nutrition, Health & Fitness, Health

4.82K Ratings

🗓️ 7 July 2025

⏱️ 3 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In this conversation, we continue our discussion about how to read scientific papers—no PhD required. We break down how to spot red flags like flashy headlines, suspicious journals, and undisclosed conflicts of interest. You’ll learn what “peer-reviewed” actually means, how to tell if a journal is reputable, and why the number of times a study is cited matters. We also explain when an older study is still trustworthy and how to tell if an author might be biased. This episode is your shortcut to understanding which studies to take seriously and which to skip.

To hear the rest of this episode, sign up for the Foodie Fam!

For weekly notes on our episodes, sign up for the Food We Need to Talk newsletter!

Check out our book!

Chat with us on IG!

Be friends with Juna on IG and Tiktok!

Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome back to another episode of the talk today.

0:03.3

We are going through how to spot BS papers without having to have any scientific background.

0:09.8

So the first thing we're going to talk about, guys, this is just a box you can check on any sort of website where you look for papers.

0:16.9

It's a box that says peer reviewed.

0:18.7

And what that basically means is people in this person's field have read their paper and have like approved it.

0:26.2

It's not by a crazy.

0:27.5

There are some crazies out there who's like they might still have a title and like they might publish a crazy paper.

0:32.3

And nobody in their field is going to actually approve of that paper.

0:36.6

Right.

0:36.8

So this is a really rigorous process.

0:39.4

It gets sent out anonymously, right?

0:42.7

Yeah.

0:43.3

So I think I shared in the...

0:45.0

You've peer reviewed.

0:46.0

Yeah, of course, yeah, because if you're in the literature, they need other people to read it,

0:50.0

so they'll send you an article.

0:51.2

You agree to review it.

0:53.4

If you have any conflict, then you have to declare that.

0:57.4

And if you're non-conflicted, then you're asked to review.

1:00.4

And you say, is this worthy of publication?

1:02.8

Is it new?

1:03.9

That's one of the questions that's asked.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Juna Gjata, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Juna Gjata and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.