People may send us to Krishna like nothing.

People think Krishna is talking about detachment.

People are talking about detachment because of fear of suffering.

Can you do something well being detached about it?

From my limited understanding or at least what we learned in textbooks is

Buddhism talks about how we should not be attached to something or how in certain cases we should be detached.

I mean it talks about how suffering, one of the reasons behind suffering is attachment.

Now my question to you Sadguru, how can I help a particular friend or empathize with him

if I'm not attached with him? So this obsessiveness or attachment is it necessarily bad?

See, this attachment, detachment, business is a misunderstanding that's come out of the

Dita in this country. People may send us to Krishna like nothing in the sense.

People think Krishna is talking about detachment. Please look at his life, his life is involvement

isn't it? If you look at the scape of whatever we know about his life, whatever little we know about

his life, his life spells involvement, involvement, involvement with everything around him.

So this person unfortunately is being accused of detachment. See, if there is no involvement,

there is no life. You can only know life with involvement, even if the meal that you eat today,

if you're not involved, you will not know what it is. Without involvement you cannot even taste life,

not possible. People are talking about detachment because of fear of suffering.

Fear of suffering has come because when they involve they get entangled, they do not know how to

get involved, they just get entangled. Entanglement is happening because your involvement is very

discriminatory. Is that sinking in? So I should be equally involved in everything, is what you

saying? Tell me, if you are less involved in your breath and more involved in your eating,

...