How Theology Impacts Apologetic Methodology: Guest Eric Hernandez

Soteriology 101 w/ Dr. Leighton Flowers

Leighton Flowers

Baptist, Atonement, Reformed, Bible, Religion & Spirituality, Calvinism, Biblical, Arminianism, Calvin, Christianity, Christian

4.8 • 826 Ratings

🗓️ 4 September 2017

⏱️ 55 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Guest Eric Hernandez joins Dr. Leighton Flowers for a discussion over Apologetic methodology by interacting with a recent Dividing Line program from Dr. James White. This program clearly shows specifically how one's soteriology impacts their apologetic methodology. (Part 1 of 2)

For more on Eric you can visit him here: http://www.erichernandezministries.com/

To hear Eric and Sye's original debate go here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfJrwW9QLHQ

To listen the Dr. William Lane Craig interact with this discussion go here: http://www.reasonablefaith.org/reasonable-faith-podcast/latest

To watch the original DL program with Dr. White go here: https://www.youtube.com/user/AominOrg

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	It's time for the Soteriology 101 podcast, where God is most glorified by his love and provision for all people.
0:09.4	Welcome your host, the director of apologetics for Texas Baptists, an adjunct professor of theology, and a local teaching pastor, Dr. Layton Flowers.
0:20.2	Hello and welcome to Sociology 101.
0:22.3	You can see on the screen I have a guest with me today.
0:25.2	Not two guests.
0:26.1	We actually only have one.
0:27.3	One of those is recorded.
0:29.2	Dr. James White is obviously with Alpha Mega Ministries.
0:32.2	He's done a couple of broadcast in response to Eric Hernandez, who had a debate with Sy 10 Brutoncake on the apologetic
0:41.8	methodologies.
0:43.2	And Dr. William Lane Craig, actually at Reasonable Faith, at his podcast, has done a review of this as well,
0:50.4	which Eric was really defending William Lane Craig's position as an apologist who
0:59.0	holds to a particular approach called more of a classic approach. Some may call it evidentialism,
1:07.3	but not pure evidentialism. I'm learning this myself, so y'all can hear that I'm a kind of a student here in learning these things myself. But then there's also the presuppositional approach. And so before we launch into this and we hear from Dr. White, Eric, welcome to the show, first of all. And we've had a couple of conversations, Google Hangouts and things like that, but this is for our
1:28.0	broadcast audience, you know, more a wide audience here. And I want to get first, before we hear
1:32.8	from Dr. White's critique of you, give us just a real short summary, if it's at all possible,
1:38.9	between your approach, Dr. Craig's approach and your approach, who are classical apologists and what someone like
1:47.1	James White, who is more of a presuppositional apologist, give us just a brief introduction to those
1:52.3	two views.
1:53.6	Uh-huh.
1:54.1	Yeah, really quick.
1:55.3	For the classical apologists, which is what I would consider myself and Craig would consider
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Leighton Flowers, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Leighton Flowers and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.