Welcome to the News Hour. The U.S. Supreme Court delivered a major decision today, one that will limit federal judges' power to block the president's agenda nationwide.

The decision which resulted from a case related to an executive order on birthright citizenship rules that individual judges cannot grant nationwide injunctions to block any policies coming from the White House.

The court ruled six to three along partisan lines. In her opinion, Justice Amy Coney-Barritt wrote,

no one disputes that the executive has a duty to follow the law, but the judiciary does not have

unbridled authority to enforce this obligation. In fact, sometimes the law prohibits the

judiciary from doing so. The justices did not rule on the merits of the Trump administration's

restrictions on birthright citizenship, but the president welcomed the ruling during a press

briefing today. Thanks to this decision, we can now properly file to proceed with these numerous policies

and those that have been wrongly enjoined on a nationwide basis, including birthright citizenship,

ending sanctuary, city funding, suspending refugee resettlement, freezing unnecessary funding,

stopping federal taxpayers from paying for

transgender surgeries and numerous other priorities of the American people.

The Justice has also ruled on four other cases today, one upholding a key provision of the Affordable

Care Act, another upholding a Texas law requiring age verification for pornography

sites, one related to internet and phone service to rural and low-income communities, and a case

involving LGBTQ-themed books in schools. For more, we're joined now by our Supreme Court

analyst and SCOTUS blog co-founder Amy Howe and Amanda Frost,

Professor of Immigration and Citizenship Law at the University of Virginia.

Thank you both for being here.

Thank you.

So, Amy, the Supreme Court siding with the Trump administration on nationwide injunctions,

walk us through what that means in practice.

...