How the Supreme Court became the most trusted branch, and how electoral politics might undo that

Sidebar

The Washington Post

News, True Crime, Politics

4.1 • 4.6K Ratings

🗓️ 24 September 2020

⏱️ 33 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The passing of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg last week, has created a vacancy on the bench. President Trump and the Republicans have since taken steps toward quickly confirming a conservative replacement for Ginsburg, who was a liberal icon.

Trump is expected to announce a nominee late this week, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has suggested confirmation hearings in the Senate Judiciary Committee could begin mid-October.

Republicans hope the Supreme Court fight will inject a last-minute boost into both Trump’s reelection bid and the battle for the Senate majority.

Meanwhile, Democrats have vowed to fight in the hearings and on the Senate floor, citing precedent set by Senate Republicans who refused to consider President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nominee during an election year. But beyond procedural tactics to slow the process, there may not be much that Democrats can do to stop Trump’s pick for a conservative justice from filling the seat on the court.

Is such a speedy nomination and confirmation process unusual when it comes to new Supreme Court Justices? How much power does a president have to push through a confirmation?

And as questions arise about how the Democrats might retaliate, including court packing, is changing the number of justices really possible? How much does the Constitution actually dictate?

Plus, increasingly political confirmation hearings and the prominence of Supreme Court as an issue on the campaign trail have really added to a sense of a politicized judiciary. Taken together, does all of this compromise the independence of the highest court in the land?

On this episode of the “Can He Do That?” podcast, we capture the evolution of our Supreme Court and how that history informs what’s happening in Congress and on the campaign trail today, in conversation with senior congressional correspondent Paul Kane and Lisa Holmes, associate professor of political science at the University of Vermont.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	The passing of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg last week has created a vacancy
0:06.5	on the bench.
0:08.0	President Trump and Republicans have since taken steps toward quickly confirming a conservative
0:12.3	replacement for Ginsburg, who was a liberal icon.
0:15.7	Trump is expected to announce a nominee late this week, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch
0:19.7	McConnell has said confirmation hearings in the Judiciary Committee could begin as early
0:23.6	as mid-October.
0:25.8	Republicans are hoping that the Supreme Court fight will inject a last minute boost into
0:29.4	Trump's reelection bid and the battle for the Senate Majority.
0:32.9	Meanwhile, Democrats have vowed to fight in the hearings end on the Senate floor, citing
0:37.6	precedent set by Senate Republicans who refused to consider President Obama's Supreme Court
0:42.0	nominee in an election year that was back in 2016.
0:45.7	But beyond procedural tactics to slow the process, there may not be much that Democrats
0:50.1	can actually do to stop Trump's pick for a conservative justice from filling the seat
0:54.9	on the court.
0:56.0	It's such a speedy nomination and confirmation process unusual when it comes to new Supreme
1:00.2	Court justices, and how much power does the president have to push through a confirmation?
1:05.2	And as questions arise about how the Democrats might retaliate, including court packing, is
1:09.5	changing the number of justices really possible?
1:12.8	How much of all of this does the Constitution actually dictate?
1:16.0	Plus, increasingly political confirmation hearings and the prominence of the Supreme
1:20.2	Court as an issue on the campaign trail have really added to a sense of a politicized
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Washington Post, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Washington Post and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.