meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Reveal

How Teaching Kids to Read Went So Wrong

Reveal

The Center for Investigative Reporting and PRX

News

4.78K Ratings

🗓️ 11 February 2023

⏱️ 52 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Corinne Adams’ son Charlie came home from school with notes from his teacher saying he was doing great in reading. He seemed to be able to read the little books he was getting at school. But during the pandemic, Corinne had to give him a reading test at home, and she realized her son couldn’t read. He’d been memorizing books that were read to him but he didn’t know how to read new words he’d never seen before. Corinne decided to teach him herself.

It’s a surprisingly common story. And kids who aren’t on track by the end of first grade are in danger of never becoming good readers. Two thirds of fourth graders in the United States are not proficient readers. The problem is even worse when you look beyond the average and focus on specific groups of children: 83% of Black fourth graders don’t read proficiently.

American Public Media reporter Emily Hanford digs into a flawed theory that has shaped reading instruction for decades. The theory is that children can learn to read without learning how to sound out words, because there are other strategies they can use to figure out what the words say. Strategies like “look at the picture” or “think of a word that makes sense.”

Research by cognitive scientists has demonstrated that readers need to know how to sound out words. But some teacher training programs still emphasize this debunked theory, including books and classroom materials that are popular around the world. Scientists say these strategies are teaching children the habits of struggling readers. Kids learn to skip letters and words and struggle to understand what they’re reading.

Hanford looks at the work of several authors who are all published by the same educational publishing company. One, Lucy Calkins, is a “rock star” among teachers. Her books and training programs are wildly popular. Calkins has now decided to rewrite her curriculum in response to “the science of reading.” But other authors are sticking to the idea that children can use other strategies to figure out the words. Their teaching materials are in classrooms all over the country.

Reporter Christopher Peak also contributed to this story.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

From the Center for Investigative Reporting in PRX, this is reveal. I'm Al-Letson.

0:05.6

Guide dogs lead very interesting lives. For kinder 12 years, they are in charge of guiding,

0:12.7

applying person.

0:14.2

This is a recording from the U.S. Department of Education. They give a reading test every

0:19.3

two years to a sample of kids.

0:21.5

Most guide dogs are born at a camel.

0:24.8

This is a fourth grader who did well on the test, reading a passage about guide dogs.

0:30.8

Don't strain and large groups for about 30 months.

0:33.8

But most kids don't do well on this test.

0:37.1

Dogs are...

0:40.3

A third of fourth graders sound more like this.

0:43.7

Dogs who lead very interesting lives.

0:55.7

This child struggles with words that are key to understanding what's going on.

1:00.4

Words like guide and blind.

1:11.3

In the U.S., one out of every three kids in the fourth grade reads like this.

1:17.0

How did that happen?

1:18.9

This week, we're teaming up again with the investigative reporting group at American

1:23.3

Public Media.

1:24.9

APM reporter Emily Hanford has spent years digging into why so many kids can't read.

1:31.8

In the new podcast, Soul to Story, she offers an answer.

1:36.0

Cognitive scientists have figured out how children learn to read, but that science has struggled

1:42.2

to get traction in schools because many teachers believe in something else.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Center for Investigative Reporting and PRX, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Center for Investigative Reporting and PRX and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.