4.2 • 3.3K Ratings
🗓️ 22 May 2025
⏱️ 42 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
The Northwestern history professor and New Yorker contributor Daniel Immerwahr joins Tyler Foggatt to discuss the ways in which the COVID crisis deepened Americans’ distrust of institutional experts and propelled R.F.K., Jr., to the height of political power in the Trump Administration. Plus, they talk about how Anthony Fauci’s clashes and eventual reconciliation with AIDS activists in the nineteen-eighties and nineties could serve as a guide to repairing the rift between Americans who are skeptical of experts and the officials who set public-health policy today.
This week’s reading:
“R.F.K., Jr., Anthony Fauci, and the Revolt Against Expertise,” by Daniel Immerwahr
“Who Gets to Be an American?,” by Michael Luo
“The Stakes of the Birthright-Citizenship Case,” by Ruth Marcus
“Donald Trump’s Culture of Corruption,” by Isaac Chotiner
“The Mideast Is Donald Trump’s Safe Place,” by Susan B. Glasser
Tune in to The Political Scene wherever you get your podcasts.
To discover more podcasts from The New Yorker, visit newyorker.com/podcasts. To send feedback on this episode, write to [email protected].
Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choicesClick on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Hi, Daniel. Thanks for being here. Hi, Tyler. It's a pleasure to be back. Do you believe that the public has fundamentally misunderstood RFK Jr.? Yeah, I mean, I started this thinking the thing that everyone around me thought, which is that this man is a |
0:22.5 | maniac. And to even engage with his theories or to read his books is to stumble down a dangerous vortex. |
0:30.5 | I no longer think that. I've read those books. And I see him as a important social figure, which is a skeptic. |
0:39.2 | Skeptics can be dangerous. |
0:40.8 | Skeptics can be destabilizing. |
0:43.2 | Skeptics perhaps shouldn't be the country's top health official. |
0:46.3 | But skeptics are important, and I've come to understand him in that way. |
0:50.1 | That's Daniel Imrewar, a historian at Northwestern University, who just wrote a piece for the New Yorker about the death of expertise in American society. |
0:59.0 | It's about how, somewhere along the way, a big chunk of the country stopped trusting institutional experts, like scientists and doctors. |
1:07.3 | One vivid example of this is Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who went from being an environmentalist, |
1:13.1 | widely respected by other Democrats, to becoming an outspoken skeptic of vaccines and the face |
1:18.5 | of the anti-expertice movement. Kennedy, of course, is now the Secretary for Human Health |
1:24.1 | Services. Daniel and I spoke about how Kennedy's assent reflects a broader cultural shift. |
1:29.3 | The places where experts like Anthony Fauci |
1:31.2 | may have gone wrong, eroding public trust |
1:33.4 | in the government, and what all of this means |
1:35.5 | for the future of public health, democracy, and science. |
1:39.0 | You're listening to the political scene. |
1:41.1 | I'm Tyler Foggett, and I'm a senior editor at The New Yorker. |
1:51.0 | Thank you. political scene. I'm Tyler Foggett, and I'm a senior editor at The New Yorker. You just wrote a piece for The New Yorker titled The Revolt Against Expertise. |
1:55.2 | How much of this revolt is about ideology or science versus institutional gatekeeping and the idea of who gets to speak authoritatively |
2:04.6 | in public life? I had assumed just reading the headlines that this was an argument between |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from WNYC Studios and The New Yorker, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of WNYC Studios and The New Yorker and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.