Welcome to Red Meat, a collection of the tastiest tidbits from Odyssey's conservative news talk radio stations across the country, a place where we're not afraid to dig in.

We all know by now the U.S. participated in targeted strikes in Iran at three different locations using bunker buster, bombs, and other missiles fired from a submarine and

this begs the question what next dr michael wallace 20-year navy veteran counterterrorism expert

and a professor at toulain university outlined the options on the newel norman show W.W.L. Radio in New Orleans.

So there's always this question when you take these preemptive strikes and trying to

eliminate a threat that Iran has that they could participate in. Let's start with that.

Your thoughts?

Going back, when I was a brand new naval intelligence officer,

one of the first jobs I had,

was looking at Iranian Special Forces,

and I've been looking at Iran for a number of years

through a number of different jobs,

and I can say that allowing Iran to get a nuclear weapon would be a very bad idea.

I'm not just for Israel in the Middle East, but also here in the United States.

So I am pleased about what happened, the U.S. actions.

I think it was a tremendous success, both militarily, and more importantly,

keeping this whole operation a secret is very impressive.

So, obviously, it comes with risk, right?

And there's been a lot of saber rattling and a lot of rhetoric that's been coming out by the Iranians.

What is their capacity at this point? And I know what the president has asked for is an unconditional surrender.

They have surrendered in the past.

I wouldn't say it was unconditional,

...