From the Quantum Fiber Studio.

This is Bump and Stacey on Seattle Sports.

Streaming through the Seattle Sports app and at Seattlesports.com.

Now here are your hosts, Michael Bumpus and Stacey Ross.

What does a bad draft really look like for the Seattle Seahawks?

And for that matter, what would a good one look like? Right now they're staring at four picks the first being at number 32 overall what's the move and what will success feel like on day three when we don't know what these guys are going to become all right we just know the names that are taken so bump for you what would like a bad draft look like? A bad draft.

Drafting a receiver first. We don't need receivers, right? Receivers are good. They're not going to do that. That would just be the worst move that you can do. You got Rashid, you got Cooper Cup, you got Horton, Bobo's back. if you're drafting a receiver early

if you're the CIS, one of your first few picks, I think that's

the wrong way to go.

Doesn't mean that they won't get one. back. If you're drafting a receiver early, if you're the C-HOS, one of your first few picks, I think that's the wrong way to go.

Doesn't mean that they won't get one. But there are positions that we look at that we feel I need a little bit of depth, right? I've said this before. This isn't a draft where you find a starter. I don't think unless you're drafting 32 and you get priced, that's going to be a starter. This is a draft where you're just looking to add some depth. So I think that if you do not, one, if you walk away from this draft

without a running back, I think it's a bad draft. Even if it is a guy later that no one really

knows, that doesn't have the shine that a love or a price have, I still feel like, and I think

they still feel like,

you need to address that first.

So first step, don't draft a receiver early.

I don't think they're going to.

And also, you need to draft a running back.

It sounds like there are a lot of possible answers to what a good draft looks like for Seattle.

Does that mean it's kind of hard to come away with a disappointing draft?

I think because this team is so good, because they're so set when it comes to the foundational pieces, it is hard to walk away from this draft. And for me, at least, I think it's going to be hard for me to walk away from the draft and be like, oh, they blew it. What were they thinking? Because the only spot we're really looking at that we think needs help is a running back spot. I think the corner room or quarterback room can use some depth. But it's a bad draft to me. The only way I can see this being a bad draft, if they're doing something crazy, like draft the quarterback early or draft a wide receiver early. Yeah, which they're not. Which I don't think they're going to do that. And this, this, um draft is deep when it comes to wildouts, though. So if they, maybe they don't get priced at 32, they move back at a couple more picks. I can see them drafting a receiver late. But that should not, and I don't think it will be their priority. I would say normally that like, oh, drafting strictly for a need instead of best player makes for a bad draft. And that's me clearly not having draft experience, but going off of what John

Schneider said, where draft picks that he regrets are ones that were made purely for need,

...