Uh, from 5K.

Uh, the only thing I would say about three division games is the fact of who gets two home games and who gets one.

Yeah, it would just change every year.

So, you know, you have nine and, you know, in one season, you're playing Dallas twice at home once on the road.

You're playing the Giants twice at home, once on the road. You're playing the Giants twice at home once on the road.

You're playing Philly once on the road twice, uh, once, uh, once,

twice on the road once at home.

And then the next year you would have, you know,

it'd be, so that year you're playing five at home four on the road.

The next year you'd have four at home five on the road. They would just rotate, you know, year by year.

There's actually a lot of benefit to it. I think the issue is whether or not, you know,

it would be perceived as overly excessive and actually like almost putting those division

games into, you know, the commodity sort of bucket,

where, yeah, it's now they're just like any other games because we see them so often.

You know, you might just get oversaturated with them, but it'd be a travel reducer.

You know, there's a cost, travel reduction, safety associated with that, and it would really

emphasize the divisions, because when you go to 18, even now, only six of the 17 are division

games.

You go to 18, a true third of your games will be division games.

The other 12 won't be. You know, there's this

thought of going to some sort of seating and not guaranteeing a home game for a division

winner would somehow make the divisions less relevant. What's made the divisions a little bit

...