Hot Pursuit

Advisory Opinions

The Dispatch

News, Government, Politics

4.7 • 4K Ratings

🗓️ 2 March 2021

⏱️ 65 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments last week for Lange v. California, a Fourth Amendment case that will determine whether a police officer’s hot pursuit of a person suspected of committing a misdemeanor counts as an exigent circumstance to justify the officer’s warrantless entry onto the suspect’s property. In today’s Supreme Court heavy episode, Sarah and David also talk about two other cases dealing with hostile work environments and whether women should constitutionally be required to register for the draft. Show Notes: -Lange v. California oral arguments and transcript. -National Coalition for Men v. Selective Service System cert petition. -Robert Collier v. Dallas County Hospital District cert petition. -Rostker v. Goldberg. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	You ready?
0:02.0	I was born ready.
0:04.0	Welcome to the advisory opinions podcast.
0:22.0	This is David French with Sarah Isger and we've got some really interesting
0:28.0	Supreme Court oral argument police chase case discussion to talk about.
0:36.0	It is going to be it's like a Michael Bay movie, but over 130 pages of oral argument.
0:44.0	I will tell you this Sarah, I've seen probably every Michael Bay movie ever
0:50.0	and I've never seen one with facts this boring.
0:54.0	I think it's exciting.
0:56.0	Well, the underlying facts are of the case are super boring like not Michael Bay like.
1:02.0	There's not an explosion here.
1:04.0	We could add like there is not a there's not a gun battle.
1:06.0	There's no there's no asteroid hurtling to the US.
1:10.0	It is or to the world.
1:12.0	It's a very boring fact situation that results in a super interesting discussion
1:20.0	about encounters between police and citizens with some really interesting alignments.
1:24.0	But we're going to get to that and then we're also going to talk about as we've
1:28.0	long promised, hostile environment harassment, a fascinating case going to the
1:34.0	Supreme Court that is going to try to resolve an issue regarding the use of racial
1:38.0	slurs that we're going to use to talk about basically workplace harassment
1:42.0	born broadly and what it really is and how we often misidentify it.
1:48.0	And then the last thing we're going to talk about is should women constitutionally
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Dispatch, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Dispatch and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.