meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps

HoP 278 - Sara Uckelman on Obligations

History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps

Peter Adamson

Philosophy, Society & Culture, Society & Culture:philosophy

4.71.9K Ratings

🗓️ 21 May 2017

⏱️ 43 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Sara Uckelman soundly defeats Peter in the medieval logical game of "obligations."

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

The Hi, I'm Peter Adamson, and you're listening to the History of Philosophy podcast, brought to you

0:21.8

with the support of the Kings College London

0:23.8

philosophy department and the LMU in Munich online at www. History of philosophy

0:29.7

dot net. Today's episode will be an episode about dynamic logic in medieval obligations with Sarah

0:38.0

Uckleman who is lecturer in philosophy at the University of Durham.

0:42.1

Hi Sarah.

0:43.0

Hello.

0:44.0

Thanks for coming on the podcast.

0:45.0

Thank you for inviting me.

0:46.0

You've published a lot about this genre of logical work or logical game, we might say,

0:52.0

called Obligations.

0:54.2

And we'll get on to talking about that.

0:56.3

But first, I wanted to ask you about your approach

0:59.5

to this material, because you've argued in these publications that obligations show us an example of what sometimes called dynamic or interactive logic already in the medieval period, which would be very exciting if it were true if you're right about this because modern day logicians I mean really modern day like this is something people are interested in right now are interested in this phenomenon of dynamic logic. Can you explain what dynamic

1:26.6

logic is and what it's being opposed to, like maybe static logic?

1:30.9

Yeah, so the idea is that generally in logic you have a set of propositions and that each

1:38.0

have a truth value and this truth value is fixed.

1:40.8

And so you can ask of a certain set of propositions, what do these propositions entail?

1:46.2

And this is also going to be a fixed notion, because nothing is changing about the truth values

1:51.1

of the propositions.

1:52.5

Dynamic logic brings in a way of dealing with change.

1:56.7

So what could be true now might be false tomorrow.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Peter Adamson, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Peter Adamson and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.