meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps

HoP 170 - Gad Freudenthal on Jewish Philosophy and Science

History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps

Peter Adamson

Philosophy, Society & Culture, Society & Culture:philosophy

4.71.9K Ratings

🗓️ 6 April 2014

⏱️ 33 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Leading scholar of medieval Jewish thought Gad Freudenthal joins Peter in a concluding episode on Andalusian thought.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

And the Hi, I'm Peter Adamson, and you're listening to the History of Philosophy podcast brought to you with the support of King's College London and the LMU in Munich.

0:29.0

Online at www. History of Philosophy.net. online at God Freudental, who is professor of Jewish philosophy at the University of Geneva.

0:45.0

Hi God, thanks for coming on the podcast.

0:47.0

My pleasure.

0:48.0

We're going to be talking here about the engagement between Jewish culture and the scientific culture that came into the

0:56.8

Arabic language from the Greek tradition.

0:59.9

And so I thought I would start by asking you whether there's anything in particular you think we should bear in mind about Judaism which conditioned this engagement with the scientific literature?

1:12.0

Well, I should say there is one central feature of Judaism that should be

1:16.7

born in mind and this is that at least since the second century, Judaism was, or rather have been, a culture devoted to the study of the sacred texts of Judaism, which means the Mishna followed by the Talmud.

1:35.6

The Talmud was concluded in the, towards the end of the 5th century, and since then, being a Jewish

1:42.4

intellectual, a Jewish scholar meant studying the Talmud

1:48.3

commenting it with a lot of inventiveness and creativity. This means that what truly is in

1:56.1

the world what can be termed a Talmudo-centric culture, a culture at whose center you have the Talmud.

2:05.0

This means ipso facto that was ever was outside this sphere of Talmud commentary was an external or foreign culture or foreign knowledge.

2:19.3

And the entry of such foreign knowledge into Judaism was quite problematical and this has been the case from the first encounter of serious encounter of today with these foreign cultures which is in the eighth

2:37.4

ninth century up to today.

2:40.8

So is the problem there something more like we're already doing T

2:42.6

Tumutic commentary so we don't need to do the science, it's superfluous

2:49.4

or is it more like we're just not interested in anything other than this because it's not

2:53.6

what we're devoted to as intellectuals. Both and a third thing as well namely that

3:01.1

you are supposed to if you are a male and intellectual, you are supposed

3:06.9

to devote yourself your entire life to the study, the study of the Talmud. That means not only it's not needed, but it's even

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Peter Adamson, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Peter Adamson and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.