Hi there, everyone. It's 4 o'clock in New York. It is day 20 of the war with Iran.

And here's where things stand. A series of retaliatory strikes by Iran on oil and gas facilities across the Middle East is adding fuel to the fire that is the worst oil supply crisis in history.

It is so bad, in fact, that Donald Trump's own Treasury Secretary, Scott Besant, says they're

considering lifting sanctions on oil from Iran.

That is, of course, the country that we are at war with.

Here at home, Donald Trump's top national security officials left us all with more questions

and answers in a series of briefings.

Speaking before the House Intel Committee, Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard,

repeated a line she first trotted out yesterday to much criticism that a, quote, imminent threat

to our country is whatever Donald Trump says it is. Take a listen to this line of

questioning and answering by Congressman Jason Crowe. If you or the IC make any assessments as to the

timing of potential threats facing the United States from Iran in the last 90 days.

I'm sure there was timelines factored into the intelligence assessments that were delivered.

Did any of them show imminence?

The imminent nature of a threat is provided, is determined by the president based on a totality of the intelligence

and information provided to him. Okay. Her former deputy, Joe Kent, didn't agree and didn't

leave it to Donald Trump to tell us what the meaning of imminent is. Here he is in no uncertain terms

saying that there was, in fact, no imminent threat posed by Iran. Here he is, in no uncertain terms, saying that there was, in fact,

no imminent threat posed by Iran. The argument that there was an imminent threat, as in Iran was

planning to attack us immediately, that just simply did not exist. There was no intelligence that

said, hey, on whatever day it was, March 1st, the Iranians are going to launch

this big sneak attack. They're going to do some kind of a 9-11 Pearl Harbor, et cetera. They're

...