meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The RDL Podcast with Rabbi Daniel Lapin

Harvey Weinstein, Bill Clinton & Secular Liberal Hypocrisy - 10/14/17

The RDL Podcast with Rabbi Daniel Lapin

Blaze Podcast Network

Religion, Philosophy, Judaism, Religion & Spirituality, Society & Culture

4.8842 Ratings

🗓️ 14 October 2017

⏱️ 79 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

It’s been hilarious watching the ostentatious displays of pretend virtue by celebrities tumbling over one another to condemn one of their own.  The truth is that it takes no bravery and no courage to waddle up and stick a knife into the bleeding body of a harpooned whale lying helplessly on the beach.  Why now?  Why didn’t all those who’ve known for years condemn Weinstein back then?  Why didn’t a Paltrow or a Jolie use an Oscar speech to denounce their tormentor?  What was brother Bob’s role and why?  Weinstein et all are predictable products of the 1960s.  All explained in this week’s Rabbi Daniel Lapin Show. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

The Blaze Radio Network

0:02.5

On Demand.

0:07.5

The more the world changes, the more we find comfort in things that never change.

0:12.8

This is Rabbi Daniel Lapin on demand on the Blaze Radio Network.

0:20.4

Welcome, everybody.

0:22.1

Happy to have you at the Rabbi Daniel Afton Show, where I, your rabbi, and solemnly dedicated

0:29.8

to revealing how the world really works.

0:36.2

And, of course, well, gosh, the way the world really works is that week after week,

0:45.3

I struggle with what to include in the podcast. What should be the topic of the podcast this

0:53.3

particular week for this particular show.

0:56.7

And I have to tell you that my challenge is never, what shall I talk about?

1:04.3

Where, where can I find something of interest?

1:07.7

No, not at all.

1:10.4

My challenge each and every week is, what do I leave out? Because

1:15.5

long-time listeners to the show, I will remember that the show used to be two hours, two hours and

1:22.2

ten minutes. The show was a long show. But in trying to poll your responses, and so many of you responded to my questions

1:33.4

of what you felt was the length you wanted, many people felt that two hours was just too long.

1:40.8

And so I cut it down. And then I went to half an hour and some people say no that's that's

1:45.8

a little bit short anyway I I have a limited amount of time whatever the length of the show

1:52.1

there is a limited amount of time which invariably means that during the course of the week

1:57.2

as I deal with numerous topics and ideas and thoughts, I always have to

2:03.3

put a line through a whole bunch of them and say, no, we're going to have to put that off for

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Blaze Podcast Network, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Blaze Podcast Network and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.