Michael Popoc, Legal A.F. Trump tricks never stop.

And now we have Trump trying to disqualify and recuse Judge Arthur Angoran,

the judge in New York State Supreme Court who issued the 465 million dollar fraud judgment against Donald Trump and all people around

him based on weeks and weeks of evidence and documents because they claim that back in May,

almost six weeks ago, as reported, somebody went up to the judge in the

corner of the courthouse having nothing to do with the case, who's not a party to the case, who's not an attorney for a party in the case, and decided to venture his opinion about how Judge Angoran should render his decision.

Now that conversation would have taken place at the earliest in February and

revelations about this what appears to be a setup by some lawyer who's appeared in front of

Judge Angoran and decided to give us two cents.

That came out in press reporting in May, and now we're sitting here at the end of June

with a new motion claiming that that is a violation of the judicial ethics

on communication when it is not. I'm going to break it all down for you now from my perspective

as a practicing New York lawyer and somebody that's appeared in these

courtrooms. And we'll talk about what would happen and what will happen. The first hearing in this case,

if there's going to be a hearing at all, is going to be in front of Judge Angora not to the appellate

court not to somebody else these issues on disqualification and recusal get

decided at the first blush by the actual judge and what they have filed through Cliff Roberts who works with

Alina Haba. This is another Alina Haba special. They've argued that because

there was an apparent conversation between this lawyer not affiliated with the case, not involved with the case at all.

A guy by the name of Adam Lietman Bailey, who appears regularly as a real estate lawyer, who apparently tried to lobby the judge not to enter the judgment against Donald Trump, to not go hard on him to not apply the executive law 63-12 against him and to because it would be

Terrible for the people who say to New York terrible for business and all that. This is a guy who's

going on kind of rag sheets in New York like the daily news in the past and has

...