It is so much easier when we go into that digital realm and we surrender our relationship with the natural world.

Leaders who want to divide, they can fom it in-group, out-group behavior like that.

I mean, every one of these engineers on the social platforms fully understands that the best way to get people to share information

likes and things like that in an attention-based economy

is fear and anger-based information about an elk group. National surveillance fears are growing as the Trump administration partners with Palantir.

So reports that the Trump administration is working with Palantir to develop a centralized database of American citizens' personal information have sparked

outrage, even among the president's most loyal supporters. The proposed system would consolidate

data from agencies like the Social Security Administration, the Department of Education,

and it raises alarms about the privacy, surveillance, and potential misuse of that information.

Critics from across the ideological spectrum, including Nick Fuentes, Justin, surveillance, and potential misuse of that information. Critics from

across the ideological spectrum, including Nick Fuentes, Justin Amash, and the ACLU have warned

the database resembles authoritarian-style monitoring and poses a grave threat to civil liberties.

Supporters expressed feelings of betrayal online accusing Trump of abandoning the movement's

values, while the White House claims the initiative is aimed at improving government efficiency.

The controversy has exposed deep fractures within the MAGA base and intensified concerns about growing reach of state surveillance through AI and tech partnerships.

The question being, if a government built on promises of liberty and limited power creates the tools for

mass surveillance can still claim to represent the people or has it become the very threat

that it once warned against. I'm curious your thoughts on this. This is kind of an interesting one.

Yeah. And a lot of different ways to take it. I guess I'll just kind of go with what comes to my mind, which is I listen to these different administrations over the past several years talk about what they stand for.

And then I look at what they actually do.

And, you know, in my assessment, it's gotten just progressively inconsistent in terms of just authentic alignment.

Like, I don't even, when I hear an administration campaigning on something or saying what they're, I don't believe it.

...