meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
EconTalk

Freeman Dyson on Heresy, Climate Change, and Science

EconTalk

Library of Economics and Liberty

Ethics, Philosophy, Economics, Books, Science, Business, Courses, Social Sciences, Society & Culture, Interviews, Education, History

4.74.3K Ratings

🗓️ 7 March 2011

⏱️ 66 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Freeman Dyson of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton talks with EconTalk host Russ Roberts about science, his career, and the future. Dyson argues for the importance of what he calls heresy--challenging the scientific dogmas of the day. Dyson argues that our knowledge of climate science is incomplete and that too many scientists treat it as if it were totally understood. He reflects on his childhood and earlier work, particularly in the area of space travel. And he says that biology is the science today with the most exciting developments.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to Econ Talk, part of the Library of Economics and Liberty. I'm your host Russ Roberts

0:13.9

of George Mason University and Stanford University's Hoover Institution. Our website is econtalk.org

0:21.2

where you can subscribe, find other episodes, comment on this podcast, and find links to

0:26.5

other information related to today's conversation. Our email address is mailadicontalk.org. We'd

0:33.6

love to hear from you. Today is February 18th, 2011, and my guest is Freeman Dyson. Professor

0:44.0

Dyson, welcome to Econ Talk. Thank you. You've written in praise of heretics. What is a heretic

0:51.3

in your view, and why are they important? Well, because there's a tendency for people to

0:57.8

think in groups and to follow the party line. Most of the time we were so happy going along

1:05.8

with what other people are thinking, and it's very often what other people are thinking

1:10.5

is wrong. If you are a heretic and stick out for something unorthodox, you have a chance

1:18.8

to do something important. You said that most people are comfortable

1:23.4

going along. That's not the impression, I think, that most people have a scientist. I think

1:28.3

we have a romantic vision of scientists sitting in a laboratory seeking truth. Why do you

1:35.3

think there's groupthink in science? Well, I see it all all around me. I mean, and I'm

1:40.9

a victim of it myself. I mean, we especially in astronomy because it was the universe

1:45.8

that started away a long ago, and you have all sorts of pictures about it. Model what

1:51.2

we call models, which are descriptions of the way we think it is. Of course, they are

1:57.9

hopelessly oversimplified, but still, it's nice to have a model to have some picture of

2:03.4

what it is you're talking about. Some people just tend to believe their own models after

2:08.8

a while and do sort of lose the awareness that the model may be very different from reality.

2:18.2

Have you seen many cases in your experience where a scientist who has devoted a significant

2:23.8

chunk of time and passion to a model say it was wrong? I made a mistake.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Library of Economics and Liberty, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Library of Economics and Liberty and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.