Love this podcast support this show through the a cast supporter feature

It's up to you how much you give and there's no regular commitment. Just click the link in the show description to support now. You have Turks with troops, historically increases in U.S. food aid into some countries have actually increased conflict rather than reduce conflict.

And one of the stories there is that the food aid actually doesn't go to the people that's intended to some of the times it gets siphoned off and that's used

actually to fund conflict operations. I would say that's that finding is a little bit

disputed but it does make you think that the type of a error assistance that's

delivered is pretty important. One day all of the facts in about 30 years time will be published.

When genocide has been carried out in this country almost with impunity, and when it is near to completion,

people talk about intervention.

They will be met with fire, fury, and frankly power,

the likes of which this world has never seen before. So, Hello and I'm Jason Fields.

And I'm Matthew Galt.

The phrase climate change was originally

created to soft pedal global warming.

A hotter planet doesn't sound good. but hey, climates change all the time, from winter to summer and back again.

But it turned out to be an accurate description of what's really going on.

Deserts are drying, wet places are getting wetter, crops are dying,

and so is livestock.

And in some places, it's increasingly unsafe

to go out during the day.

So how is this affecting human conflict? The assumption is that

climate change will make things worse, but how much worse? To tell us we have

Stanford Professor Marshall Burke who has studied the issue

...