This is Hidden Killers Week in review.

I look back at the most prolific stories of the week.

This is the Hidden Killers podcast with Tony Bruske and continuing coverage of the case against Brian Koberger.

Oh, there's big things going on in the trial of Brian Koberger.

What does it all mean for the future of the case? Well, we have

a legal mind here that can help us break this all down. Eric Fattis, defense attorney, former prosecutor.

Basically, in a nutshell, a 27-page nutshell, once it's all broken down, they're asking for

stay in the trial. They're wanting more

time to go through the evidence. They say they haven't figured out their expert witnesses yet.

They haven't figured out this. They haven't figured out that. The whole thing is out there.

From your experience here, how can we tell the difference between a legitimate need for more time?

Again, it is a death penalty case, so you really got to cross the T's and dot the eyes.

So I'm certainly giving that leverage here to them.

And just basically a strategic delay that's just to basically about running the clock and maybe something will happen,

maybe more things will leak, and then more things will have to get thrown out.

I mean, what do you think is going on here in this case?

Without question, delay is a friend of the defense.

And that includes delays that are legitimate and delays that might be more strategic and however

you want to characterize it. And so, you know, certainly that they have some arguments right

for the delay. Like you said, the complexity of the case, it's a quadruple homicide, it's got

national intention, death penalty case. There's all sorts of experts and witnesses and investigations, everything else. It's a quadruple homicide. It's got national intention, death penalty case. There's all sorts

of experts and witnesses and investigations, everything else. That does tend to vote in favor of a

...