Welcome back, everyone to a new episode of Your Wrong with Molly Hemingway, editor

and chief of the Federalist and David

Harsani, senior writer at the Washington Examiner. Just as a reminder, if you'd like to email

the show, please do so at Radio at the Federalist.com. We'd love to hear from you. This week,

Molly, I think we'll start with Tulsi Gabbard's declassification of documents related to the

Russia collusion claims from the 2016 election,

specifically a January 2017 intelligence community assessment and the debate over it,

which we didn't hear about originally or initially, where there is a senior intelligence official or might be officials, you let us know,

who kind of disagreed, not kind of, like pretty vehemently, I think disagreed with the assessment

or said that there was no evidence to say that Russians had even changed, certainly tallies,

but had enough power to change the results of the elections.

Do I have that right?

Well, yes.

I think it's actually helpful because the story is so old to kind of go back and just remember what it is that we know and what we don't know.

We have interns working at the Federalist who were in their very young, like they weren't even teenagers yet when this whole thing happened.

And so.

That's crazy.

I know it's so weird.

By the way, when you're, I teach, you know, college students.

And I remember the first year, which was a long time ago now that people didn't remember 9-11. And now I'm like,

they don't even remember the Russia hoax. Like, this is crazy how time marches on. Anyway,

so, yeah, we all know about how there were these claims that Trump had colluded with Russia to

...