Feb 7, 2020 This Week in Cardiology Podcast
This Week in Cardiology
Medscape Podcasts
4.9 • 963 Ratings
🗓️ 7 February 2020
⏱️ 19 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
The NEJM retraction, TAVR 5-year results, ICD selection, long QT reversals, and lung cancer screening are the topics discussed by John Mandrola, MD in this week's podcast.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | You're listening to this week in cardiology from the heart.org on medscape. |
| 0:09.7 | You can now access the latest in medical news on your Amazon Alexa enabled device. |
| 0:14.2 | Join me, Perry Wilson, every weekday morning for Medscape Medical Minute, |
| 0:18.0 | where I highlight the top medical stories of the day. |
| 0:21.0 | To add Medscape Medical Minute to your flash briefing, search for Medscape Medical |
| 0:24.6 | Minute on Amazon and click enable. Or open the Amazon Alexa app, go to Skills, search for Medscape |
| 0:30.6 | Medical Minute and click enable. Then say, |
| 0:33.4 | Alexa, what's the news or Alexa, what's my flash briefing? I hope you'll join us. |
| 0:38.6 | Hi everyone, this is John Mandrola from the Heart.org Medscape Cardiology and this is this week in |
| 0:45.0 | Cardiology for February 7th, 2020. |
| 0:48.8 | This week, a New England Journal of Medicine Retraction, Taver, ICDs, Long QT Syndrome, and Screening. |
| 0:57.0 | First, I want to start with a correction. |
| 0:59.4 | In the last podcast, I mistakenly said the Improvit trial which was Simpestat and Azetamib when I meant |
| 1:05.8 | reduce it which is Icosopent Ethel. Sorry for that and thanks to the many listeners who noticed the error. |
| 1:13.2 | Let's start this week with the huge news of the high profile New England Journal of Medicine |
| 1:17.2 | retraction. |
| 1:18.6 | Like many stories on this podcast, I try to pick topics that have both specific and larger messages. |
| 1:25.0 | When a New England Journal of Medicine retracted a 2018 paper on ambulatory blood pressure measurements, |
| 1:32.0 | the news specifically affected how we think about blood pressure |
| 1:36.2 | and mortality, but more generally and more importantly, the retractions informs how we think about |
| 1:42.4 | the trustworthiness of traditional peer review. |
| 1:45.0 | Let's start with the concluding sentence from the editorial at that time the paper was published, |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Medscape Podcasts, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Medscape Podcasts and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

