FBI Expert Karen Read Defense Witnesses Are Damaging Their Own Case
The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe
Tony Brueski
2.2 • 614 Ratings
🗓️ 13 June 2025
⏱️ 49 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Former FBI Counterintelligence Chief Robin Dreeke provides explosive analysis of how Karen Read's defense witnesses are systematically destroying their own credibility and damaging their client's case through poor preparation, methodology failures, and damaging admissions under cross-examination. This detailed breakdown reveals why the defense's witness strategy has become a prosecutorial gift.
Dreeke examines the catastrophic testimony of vehicle data expert Matthew DiSogra, who admitted under Special Prosecutor Hank Brennan's methodical cross-examination that he conducted no actual testing in the case while offering definitive opinions about collision events. The FBI expert explains how this kind of witness overreach creates credibility disasters that competent legal teams should prevent through proper vetting and preparation.
The analysis covers the media contamination issues with snowplow driver Brian Loughran, whose admission of extensive case coverage exposure demolished defense claims of pristine eyewitness testimony. Dreeke details how contaminated witnesses often become more confident in false memories, making them particularly dangerous for the side calling them.
Drawing from his experience in witness evaluation, Dreeke breaks down how dog bite expert Dr. Marie Russell's changing opinions between trials signals narrative-driven rather than evidence-driven conclusions. The behavioral expert explains why juries recognize and reject expert testimony that appears tailored to support predetermined conclusions.
The interview reveals how the defense's apparent witness intimidation of former Canton Officer Kelly Dever represents both legal and strategic catastrophe, potentially resulting in sanctions while demonstrating desperation to manufacture favorable testimony. Dreeke explains how these tactical failures cascade, each one making subsequent witnesses appear less credible by association.
This analysis provides unique insights into witness credibility evaluation and why the Karen Read defense witnesses are helping rather than hurting the prosecution's case.
#KarenRead #DefenseWitnesses #FBI #WitnessCredibility #BehavioralAnalysis #ExpertTestimony #TrialStrategy #JohnOKeefe #MurderTrial #CrossExamination #LegalAnalysis #TrueCrime #CourtroomStrategy #TrialUpdate #Massachusetts
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?
Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This is the Hidden Killers podcast with Tony Bruske and continuing coverage of the case against Karen Reid. |
| 0:07.1 | There is a lot going on in the case against Karen Reid. The defense is still going as of our recording right here. |
| 0:13.3 | It might be getting close to resting by the time you watch or see this. But we're going to talk about what has been going on here the first week of June and a little bit of the previous week as the defense has taken the stage in the trial of Karen Reid. |
| 0:26.9 | There's been a lot of people that have taken the stand. |
| 0:28.8 | We'll kind of work our way through them. |
| 0:30.3 | Robin Drake, retired FBI special agent, chief of the counterintelligence, behavioral analysis program joining us. |
| 0:37.2 | And yeah, let's start with behavioral analyzing. |
| 0:41.0 | I know that's not a word, but it is today. |
| 0:42.9 | Word, I like that. |
| 0:44.3 | Analyzing. |
| 0:45.2 | Yes, analyzing. |
| 0:47.5 | Where the defense has been going so far with just kind of a 10,000 foot overview of who |
| 0:54.0 | they've been presenting, how it's been |
| 0:56.8 | going in your opinion thus far. Let's start there. You know, and you see how I did that, |
| 1:04.2 | you know, I really thought hard about this last night, Tony. You know, as we do our prep for our show, |
| 1:10.0 | like, you know, this is so exhausting. You know, and so anytime we have an emotion, because we're deep diving on something, the next thing you got to do is like, if you're having that emotion, other people have to have that emotion. The people I'm thinking are having that same emotion is the jury. Because that's really, if you think about it, that's really that all that matters right now is that |
| 1:29.4 | the jury is the one that matters here. |
| 1:32.3 | And what it looks like, I would imagine from the jury's point of view, but it's so hard because |
| 1:37.7 | you're not in that courtroom. |
| 1:38.8 | We're only seeing data points that are presented to us and we're watching on TV if we have |
| 1:43.3 | all that time in the |
| 1:44.2 | world. But the jury is most likely getting exhausted with the nonstop behavioral attempts to discredit |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Tony Brueski, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Tony Brueski and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.