4.6 • 656 Ratings
🗓️ 13 January 2022
⏱️ 36 minutes
🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Support for Kikiweedy Podcasts comes from Rancho La Puerta, a resort with 85 years of wellness experience. |
0:07.4 | Three and four-night August vacations include sunrise hikes, water classes, yoga, and spa therapies. |
0:14.2 | Rancho LePuerta.com |
0:15.7 | Support for Forum comes from Broadway S.F. presenting Parade, the musical revival based on a true story. |
0:23.5 | From three-time Tony-winning composer Jason Robert Brown comes the story of Leo and Lucille Frank, |
0:29.8 | a newlywed Jewish couple struggling to make a life in Georgia. When Leo is accused of an |
0:35.5 | unspeakable crime, it propels them into an unimaginable test of faith, humanity, justice, and devotion. |
0:43.6 | The riveting and gloriously hopeful parade plays the Orpheum Theater for three weeks only, May 20th through June 8th. |
0:51.9 | Tickets on sale now at Broadwaysf.com. |
0:56.9 | From KQED. |
1:13.6 | From KQED in San Francisco, I'm Nina Kim. Coming up on farm, prenatal blood tests that screen for a range of fetal abnormalities are billed by their creators in Silicon Valley as reliable and accurate, |
1:22.6 | bringing peace of mind to anxious parents. But a New York Times investigation has found that positive |
1:28.7 | results on those tests are wrong about 85% of the time. We talk with the Times, Sarah Cliff. |
1:36.8 | Then a small Central Valley city has become a site of electric vehicle use innovation. We'll |
1:41.7 | learn more about a program called the Green Riteros. Join us. |
1:45.6 | This is Forum. I'm Mina Kim. About 10 years ago, companies began offering early, non-invasive prenatal |
2:05.9 | testing for chromosomal abnormalities, and it worked. A simple blood draw from the parent at about |
2:11.6 | 10 weeks was found to be quite reliable at detecting Down syndrome, for example. Later, other companies wanted to get |
2:19.1 | into the space and began to offer screenings for rare, often more grave conditions. A new investigation |
2:27.0 | by the New York Times has found those tests are often wrong, giving an incorrect positive |
2:33.4 | result about 85% of the time. |
2:36.9 | Joining me now is Times investigative reporter Sarah Cliff. Welcome to Forum, Sarah. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from KQED, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of KQED and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.