4.2 • 639 Ratings
🗓️ 24 March 2020
⏱️ 5 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Understanding the human body is a team effort. That's where the Yachtel group comes in. |
0:05.8 | Researchers at Yachtolt have been delving into the secrets of probiotics for 90 years. |
0:11.0 | Yacold also partners with nature portfolio to advance gut microbiome science through the global grants for gut health, an investigator-led research program. |
0:19.6 | To learn more about Yachtolt, visit yawcult.co. |
0:22.7 | .jp. That's Y-A-K-U-L-T.C-O.J-P. When it comes to a guide for your gut, count on Yacult. |
0:33.5 | This is Scientific Americans, 60-second science. I'm Steve Merski. |
0:38.8 | Here in New York, the coronavirus cases are exploding. We're on the steep part of the curve. |
0:45.9 | Now, you've probably heard about the basic reproduction number, R0 or R0. |
0:52.4 | And that's basically how many people, an infected person, goes on to infect themselves. |
0:59.0 | And the other night, I happened to see a tweet that showed just how big a difference there is |
1:04.7 | over 10 cycles of transmission between a basic reproduction number of 1.3 and a basic reproduction number of |
1:14.5 | three. The difference was astounding. The 1.3 after 10 cycles infected, on average, 14 other people |
1:23.3 | total. The basic reproduction number of 3.0 led to 59,000. Looking at those numbers was |
1:31.6 | startling. So I got a calculator out. And I'm going to repeat this exercise that I did with the |
1:37.2 | calculator. And you can do it too. It's even a little bit fun and it's kind of amazing. So I've got two calculators because I'm going to do the two different basic |
1:48.9 | reproduction numbers, the R-0s, together. |
1:52.7 | Okay, so the calculator on my left, I'm going to assume 1.3 as the basic |
2:00.4 | reproduction number. Each person infects 1.3 other people on |
2:05.2 | average. The calculator on the right, I'm going to do 2.5, just to pick a number, and because that |
2:11.4 | looks like it may be fairly close to what the coronavirus number is. So we'll start with one person on each side. |
2:21.1 | We multiply by 1.3 on the left to get 1.3, obviously. We multiply by 2.5 on the right to get, not |
2:30.6 | surprisingly, 2.5. For cycle 2, we multiply the one on the left by 1.3 again, and we get 1.69. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Scientific American, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Scientific American and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.