You ready?

I was born ready.

Welcome to advisory opinions. I'm Sarah Isger. That's David French. David, we have a lot to get through.

I want to start with a little bit of sausage making so that people understand how we approach what we're going to cover on the show, especially as frankly, there's so much to cover and we're having to do more picking and choosing.

So, for instance,

right now, there are seven emergency docket cases pending at the Supreme Court. Almost all of them

have the word Trump in the title, Trump v. JGG, Trump v. Washington, Trump v. New Jersey,

Trump v. Kasa. These are the preliminary injunction,

nationwide injunction cases that we've been sort of talking about the nationwide injunctions

as a theoretical matter. And I've said, you know, for instance, they're like, well, for me,

I'm not that teed up on all of this because they're temporary, because they're

appealable. And, you know, in like three or four months, you get it resolved by the Supreme

Court, a whole bunch of other judges have seen it. It's still only temporary until the rest of

the case is litigated. But how are we deciding when to cover the actual nationwide injunctions

and the substance of them.

Yeah. So first, my general and our general default rule is if it's a nationwide injunction

coming from a district court that's, we know is going to be immediately appealed, just

immediately appealed. Our general view is to keep our powder dry until we get the circuit court

decision, which comes

usually within a matter of weeks. And the reason for that is we could be chasing our tail.

As we had with Judge Costa, you could have nine different cases, eight come out against, you know,

for the White House, one comes out for Trump

...