This episode of the Partial Examine Life is brought to you by Harry's.

If you want a great shave experience for a fraction of what you're paying now,

go to Harry's.com and get five dollars off your first purchase by entering the code P-E-L when you check out.

That's h-a-r-r-y-s.com.

You're listening to the Partial Examine Life, a philosophy podcast by some guys who are at one point

said I'm doing philosophy for a living, but then thought better of it.

Our question for episode 97 is something like which takes priority justice or the good.

And we'll be discussing the book Liberalism and the Limits of Justice by Michael J. Sandell from 1982.

You can join the discussion, get a link to the text and lots more information at harselyexaminelife.com.

This is Mark Lisenwire speaking justly from Medicine, Wisconsin.

This is Seth Paskin, day ontologically being himself in Austin, Texas.

This is Wes Aulon just in Boston, Massachusetts.

This is Dylan Casey in Middleton, Wisconsin.

So some of us possess our attributes and some of us are our attributes.

What about the ground rules? Do those in here in the discussion or they applied externally to the

discussion? Are they things the discussion possesses or are they inherent properties?

They're contingencies of the moral community.

The first one of those is try not to assume that our audience has read what we're talking about.

God, we've already failed that completely.

You won't get the jokes unless you've just you got to listen on and then go back to the beginning.

Now they will get the jokes eventually. It's a slow burn or has any other background in philosophy.

Number two, don't make arguments that hinge on something other than what we've agreed to read.

...