M-S-S-W Media.

So Renato, is Michael Cohen's testimony, the nail in the coffin for Trump?

It's complicated.

I'm Renata Marriott.

I'm a former federal prosecutor, a practicing lawyer, and a legal analyst. And I'm a former federal prosecutor, a practicing lawyer, and a legal analyst.

And I'm Asha Rangappa.

I teach national security law at Yale University.

I'm a former FBI special agent, and I'm a Legal Contributor for ABC News.

And we're here to help you understand topics that can't be boiled down into a sound bite or a tweet.

So, Asha, we got a massive trial happening right now, former president of the United States.

I know some of you have commented on YouTube, you're other cases it's like well right now

there's so much interest in this trial it's capturing international attention

very hard not to be focusing our episodes on this ongoing criminal trial of Donald Trump.

Yeah and last week we had star witness Stormly Daniels and we talked about her

testimony and this week it's Michael Cullen and I think he's kind of

the most interesting witness to talk about right because for a long time I think even when you and I talked about this case a big question about

whether this case should be brought what rested on the fact that it would kind of hinge on Michael Cohen's testimony and

whether he could really carry the case for the prosecution because of potential credibility problems given his prior convictions.

So what do you think?

Wow, well, that's a big question.

I mean, and certainly just to lay out the credibility problems here for a minute, you know, convicted of lying to, under oath to Congress, convicted of fraud, somebody who has made numerous statements that are admittedly false.

In fact, he has said that the crime he pled guilty of, he did, a fraud that he didn't actually do it.

...