The U.S., Israel, and Iran agreed that a ceasefire is now in effect, but they're contradicting

each other and themselves in terms of what's actually been agreed to and what's happened.

What happens now?

Tonight, the Speaker of Iran's parliament claims three clauses of its workable proposal

to Trump have already been violated.

That includes new Israeli strikes today in Lebanon, which Israel has refused to stop.

Iran also claims its right to nuclear enrichment was laid out very much in a 10-point plan

accepted by Trump.

But the White House suggested a 10-point plan reported today by

Iranian state media was, well, just an early draft. Vance is set to attend face-to-face

talks with Iran along with the Trump's special envoy, Steve Whitkoff, and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner,

in Pakistan on Saturday. Iran's delegation is expected to arrive tonight. The president

posted overnight that the United States military will be remaining in the region in place, as he put

it, quote, until such time as the real agreement is reached is fully complied with. If for any reason

it is not, which is highly unlikely, he writes, then he levels

the new threat. The shooting starts bigger and better and stronger than anyone has ever seen

before. Clear it up in any kind of actual ceasefire agreement? I think with normal administrations,

that's the case. Normally you have a text and all the sides look at it and change sentences or words or phrases.

This latest ceasefire, which evidently was at the initiative of the U.S. administration, and they used Pakistan to bring it about, seems to have been off the cuff.

And it seemed to have included a full secession of all hostilities

to include Lebanon, but evidently Israel wasn't consulted enough or agreed to disagree.

So this is why we have a ceasefire that never took hold that no sides are living up to

...