operating off of far more facts than we are. So at the end of the day, as Craig said,

we elected them, we got to trust them, right? But the immediate issue is furred out. I mean,

that's just it. So you don't have to go all the way. People talk about regime change,

everything else. You just got to mitigate the immediate issue. If you do that,

then take, like I said, take the deal off the table. If you get rid of the immediate threat,

well, then you bought some time. Now, ultimately, regime change is where this thing has to devolve to.

At the end of the day, whether you like it or not, you have an adversary who cannot exist without

that bomb. The Muller's cannot list long term without that bomb. They learn the lessons of Gaddafi. We need this thing.

They're going to keep trying. That's the solar is to it. So you got this adversary. They say they

want to kill you. They're trying to get the bomb. At the end of the day, at some point they've got to go.

But you don't need that right now. You just got to mitigate the immediate problem, which is Ft out. What I think he's doing is, and that's why I think you can see this two-week window. The last thing he wants is any American blood here. And right now, the Iranians still do

have some offensive capacity. They do have the ability to fire missiles, maybe hit some American

assets, and in many ways, almost worst, almost worst, is hitting some of our adversaries,

excuse me, some of our allies.

You get some dead Europeans and et cetera in some place inside the red zone in Iraq.

We got an international McGillard.

That's the last thing he wants.

I think he's buying time, waiting until they are out of that capacity.

And then my own opinion, I think that's when he moves.

And then ultimately, long term, if you notice, we hit their internal security.

That's the besiege.

That's the one who keep their people down.

...