meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Blocked and Reported

Episode 42: What In The Everloving Name Of Diversity, Equity, And Inclusion Is Going On At Google? (with Jon Stokes)

Blocked and Reported

Katie Herzog and Jesse Singal

Unknown

4.64.1K Ratings

🗓️ 12 December 2020

⏱️ 61 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

A major blowup at at Google led to the firing or resignation (depending on who you ask) of Timnit Gebru and accusations that the company's social-justice efforts are performative at best. But behind the scenes, some Googlers are telling a different, slightly more complicated story. Who's right? Katie and Jesse bring on Jon Stokes, an Ars Technica founder who is much better connected in the tech world than they are, to help explain this tangled controversy.

(Correction: In the original version of this episode we posted for our patrons, our guest, Jon Stokes, wrongly described Timnit Gebru's academic background as being in sociology, with her having also done some work in computer science. That should have been flipped: She has a PhD from the Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, but has done plenty of work that intersects with sociology. Jon also said she was educated at M.I.T., but all her degrees are from Stanford. Whenever an error makes it into the final show, that is 100% the fault of hosts, and we apologize. We've snipped out the audio containing the errors and added a link to Gebru's Stanford page to the top of the show notes.)

(More corrections, 12/18/2020: In the original versions of this pocast, both free and patrons-only, Jon also said at approximately 20:40 that Gebru had been at Google since 2016, though he hedged this with an "I think.". She had actually only been at Google since 2019 [YIKES -- actually 2018. Listen to the updated episode for a correction of the correction]. At about 56:30 [free version timestamp], he laid out a storyline, which he presented as informed speculation, in which Jeffrey Dean, head of Google AI, had promised Gebru and some of her allies in 2016 that they could do ethical work. Then, in this telling, Google pivoted to AI, and as a result Gebru and her colleagues' work was seen as a liability and came under more scrutiny. But that storyline doesn’t quite work, as Jon presented it, given that Gebru only arrived at Google in 2019, well after Sundar Pichai announced the company would be “AI first” in 2016. We've snipped out the audio containing these errors and will be discussing all of this episode's errors on the free episode of the podcast set to go live 12/21/2020, and earlier for patrons.)

Show notes/Links:

Timnit Gebru's background: https://ai.stanford.edu/~tgebru/

Jon Stokes: https://twitter.com/jonst0kes

His site, The Prepared: http://www.theprepared.com

The New York Times: Google Chief Apologizes for A.I. Researcher’s Dismissal - https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/09/technology/timnit-gebru-google-pichai.html

The New York Times: Google Researcher Says She Was Fired Over Paper Highlighting Bias in A.I. - https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/03/technology/google-researcher-timnit-gebru.html

Wired: Behind the Paper That Led to a Google Researcher’s Firing - https://www.wired.com/story/behind-paper-led-google-researchers-firing/

Platformer: The withering email that got an ethical AI researcher fired at Google - https://www.platformer.news/p/the-withering-email-that-got-an-ethical

MIT Technology Review: We read the paper that forced Timnit Gebru out of Google. Here’s what it says. - https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/12/04/1013294/google-ai-ethics-research-paper-forced-out-timnit-gebru/

Twitter: Yann LeCun on the data problem - https://twitter.com/ylecun/status/1274782757907030016

Twitter: Gebru disagrees - https://twitter.com/timnitGebru/status/1274808654227619840

(Note: As of 10:45 a.m. on Saturday I'm having trouble finding the throaway Reddit posts we mention, but when I do I'll add those as well. Update: Thanks, John, for posting this in the comments: https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/k77sxz/d_timnit_gebru_and_google_megathread/gepq3u8/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)



This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.blockedandreported.org/subscribe

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hey guys, it's Jesse. The episode you're about to hear is about some controversy going on within Google.

0:05.7

An obvious point we failed to make in the actual episode, so I make it now, is if you work at Google and you want to talk to us about any of this,

0:12.8

even just to tell us why we're wrong.

0:15.1

Definitely don't hesitate to get in touch block to report your podcast at Gmail.com.

0:18.8

You can obviously use a burner account if we need to at some point, forget a way to confirm your who you say you are.

0:24.6

I'm sure we can find a safe way to do that, but definitely don't hesitate to reach out, because we would love to hear from you.

0:29.0

Thank you, and I hope you enjoy the episode.

0:32.6

KAD, how's it going?

0:33.8

Hey Jesse, pretty good. I saw an interesting paper today that I wanted to talk to you about, real quick.

0:38.2

Go for it.

0:38.7

Okay, so this is a write-up from Reason Magazine by Robbie Swave, a friend of the pod.

0:42.8

The headline is, Self-Victimhood is a personality type researcher's fine, and this is a section from his piece.

0:49.2

A new paper in the scientific journal, Personality and Individual Differences,

0:53.0

posits a tendency for interpersonal victimhood, an archetype defined by several truly toxic traits.

0:59.2

A pathological need for recognition, a difficulty empathizing with others, feelings of moral superiority,

1:06.0

as well as a thirst for pizza, attraction of gaming, possession of non-traditionally shaped eyes,

1:12.0

propensity for equine relations, and Jesse, how tall are you?

1:15.5

Seeks four.

1:16.3

Oh my god, that is so weird.

1:17.5

That is the exact same type of, same height as most people who display this personality type.

1:22.9

What are the chances?

1:23.9

That is weird.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Katie Herzog and Jesse Singal, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Katie Herzog and Jesse Singal and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.