Welcome to Courtside, everyone, a discussion of the post-election litigation brought by Donald Trump.

We've reached it day 40 after the election.

The litigation count stands at one out of 60 cases, 6-0, that Trump has won.

And his one victory didn't give him any votes.

Biggest loser ever, ever.

Trump lost one more since I talked to you yesterday in the Georgia Supreme Court. Trump had filed a case trying to get the Secretary of

Georgia's certification thrown out. The Georgia Supreme Court denied his attempt for emergency relief

saying Trump didn't meet the high bar that was required.

At this point, Trump has zero cases, and the Trump East does, zero cases anywhere in the trial

courts, zilch. All he's got now is appeals from past cases that he has lost somewhere else.

Like the one in the Wisconsin Supreme Court

we talked about yesterday, which hasn't been ruled on yet. That's the one where the justice

is openly referred to Trump's lawsuit as racist. That's all he's got. The fallout from Trump's

unanimous loss in the United States Supreme Court in the Texas case,

a.k.a. the big one, continues. Trump just tweeted a few hours ago, quote,

the fact that the Supreme Court wouldn't find standing an original jurisdiction between matter

between multiple states and including the president of the states is absurd. It is enumerated in the

Constitution. End quote. I would love to know where Donald Trump finds that enumerated in the

Constitution. I mean, the Constitution doesn't actually even mention the word standing, let alone

standing for the president. And I don't know what president of the states is anyway.

And if you want to know where the standing doctrine actually comes from, I point you to this 1983 Law Review article called The Doctrine of Standing is an essential element of the separation

of powers. Now, you can see the author there, Hugo Chavez, I mean, Antonin Scalia.

...