Welcome to day two of Courtside, and I'll be doing this for as long as this election litigation stuff is going to continue.

So today we learned not that much about the election strategy. We've learned that he's going to continue.

Now, look, Donald Trump is no great legal strategist. He is famous for losing in the Supreme Court and other courts

more than any other president. I guess what he'd say is he loses like a dog, which is to me

very mean to dogs. But this is a guy who's lost case after case from the census to DACA to

Title VII for LGBT workers, so on and so on.

But he's insisting on continuing, and today we learned that he's advised by his great legal

strategist, Jared Kushner, to keep doing so, and perhaps the only person who has worse judgment

than Trump is Kushner.

This is the guy who said to Trump, if you fire Jim Comey, it'll get rid of the Russia thing.

This is the guy who said in March with respect to coronavirus, quote, free markets will solve this.

So not exactly someone whose judgment is impeccable the way you'd want to advise a president in the United States.

We've been talking about the same three problems in this

litigation, and they're continuing today. One, Trump's arguments are all about trying to throw out

votes to discount them, and our courts generally see that kind of litigation is un-American. Second,

Trump is boxing at a few technicalities. He's saying there's 53 votes here, 93 votes there to throw out.

These are small potatoes and not enough to shift the election.

And third, he's got to win in multiple states.

This isn't Bush versus Gore, which is only about Florida.

Because Trump lost in so many different states, he's got to invalid because Trump lost in so many different states,

he's got to invalidate the results in so many different states. That is, to put it mildly,

in uphill battle. He's filed 10 cases now since Election Day. He's zero for 10. Now look,

...