meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

Episode 171: Buddhism vs. Evolution with Guest Robert Wright (Part Two)

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

Mark Linsenmayer

Society & Culture, Philosophy

4.62.3K Ratings

🗓️ 11 September 2017

⏱️ 65 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Continuing on Why Buddhism Is True. We discuss the "no self" doctrine as articulated in Buddha's Second Discourse and the modularity-of-mind theory that Bob claims supports it.

What are the ethical implications, and do we really need meditation to achieve its alleged ethical benefits?

Continued from part 1, or get the ad-free Citizen Edition. Please support PEL!

End song: "Alphalpha Bhang" by Anton Barbeau, as interviewed on Nakedly Examined Music ep. 50.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Partially examined life relies on your support to find out how to help in ways that are cheap or even free for you

0:05.4

Check out partially examined life.com slash support

0:16.3

You're listening to the partially examined life episode 171 part two on Robert Wright's book

0:22.9

Why Buddhism is true the science and philosophy of meditation and enlightenment?

0:27.2

We're here with Robert still and the full boat of hosts

0:31.8

It's a crowded place

0:33.4

So maybe we should turn uh slow down a little and turn back to the no self doctrine in fact

0:38.7

Bob you'd point at us to an original text that you discuss at some length in chapter five of your book

0:45.0

Buddha's second discourse on the not self-characteristic right?

0:49.6

Yeah, that's a famous supposedly certainly in in teravodin tradition at least that's considered

0:55.8

His second sermon after his enlightenment. I mean the first sermon after his enlightenment is the famous

1:02.8

Suffering is the problem these are the roots of suffering. This is what you do and then as a kind of

1:08.2

Testament to what an important doctrine not self is

1:11.2

It's this discourse on the not self that is supposedly his second discourse after his enlightenment and the further underscores importance

1:19.3

It is said at the end of this that all the monks who listened to this

1:24.0

Immediately became so-called aura hotz which basically means they attained enlightenment by virtue of grasping the idea of

1:32.4

Not self. So it's an important document

1:34.9

That seems a punchline for a lot of those old documents is that they teach teach teach and they're enlightened

1:40.4

Yeah, well, this is you know by the way if you if you look at the sati patana suta the sutra that describes mindfulness meditation

1:48.1

Sati being the term that has been translated as mindfulness at the end of that it says if you do all this right

1:55.9

You can attain nirvana

1:57.4

So it sounds like wait a second. What is it that brings nirvana is it grasping not self as a mindfulness meditation?

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Mark Linsenmayer, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Mark Linsenmayer and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.