Just let you both know, I am going to be recording this.

Thanks, GDPR.

I hope so.

Pan, pan, pan, pan, pan, pan, pan, pan, pan, pan, pan, pan, pan, pan, pan, pan, pan, pan, pan, pan, pan, pan, pan, pan, pan, pan, pan, pan, panacy in Peril. Our inquiry question, if cookies are so bad, why do they taste?

So good.

We're going to start this section by talking about some of the

other reasons that we might value privacy. We're then going to be getting into some examples

of corporate surveillance and big government surveillance as well. At the end of our last section,

we're talking about how the Lees thinks that privacy

is a public good, as in it's not just good for your own sake and for your own information,

but you impact other people in the society and the world that you occupy when you give up that

data or when other people take and use that data for other means. Now, in his excellent book, Neil Richards says that you might think, as I think I do and a lot of people do,

that privacy is an intrinsic good.

It's a good in and of itself.

It's nice to have a forest, a library, a bedroom, his example, not mine, without being observed by other people.

But there are some people, and he gives examples of law enforcement officers and other

technologists that may be unconvinced that privacy matters.

He says to make a robust strong case for the protection of privacy, we need to point to

the instrumental goods that are in society as

well. Identity, freedom, consumer protection. Yeah, and you don't even have to go, I like

at the way you said they're like technologists and those pesky lawyers. You probably have come

across this. You're feeling yourself as a listener to a show like this.

...