This fall, I will be teaching a new online class, foundational texts in political philosophy.

Learn more about it and express your interest at partially examinedlife.com slash class.

You're listening to Partially Examine Life, episode 370, part two.

We've been discussing the first two lectures within Christine Korsgaards, The Sources of Normativity.

And I think given how much time we spent with Hume before this,

and Hume is sort of her big first example of what this reflective endorsement method that

she ultimately is going to recommend. She's the first one. She talks at length who made use of that.

Okay, well, you know, let's do the anthropology. Let's do the psychology. Let's figure out what kind of

things that we actually do think is moral. But then now that we've done that, gone through that process, do we still think those

are moral?

If we discovered, we only think these are moral because your society has brainwashed you, because

it's the capitalist system, then we might reject morality, or at least reject that

morality.

If we do the Nietzschean thing and we say,

oh, this is just the bad Christian ideology that screwed you up, then we reject that.

Morality makes us sick, in other words. Nietzsche and Freud, she refers to both of them.

So a successful endorsement would say, you know, wherever we get, even if, you know, whether we do it

with what we've been handed down or what we find that as reflective adults, we now hold.

If we can go through that process of looking at its origins and still stand behind it, then, well,

that's pretty good. And so that seems to be what Hume did that, like, well, here's the

stuff we approve of. Well, do you like that you approve of that? I mean, it seems like you do.

You keep questioning it. Look at it through different points of view. Does it hurt other people to,

...