meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

Ep. 347: Nyaya Sutra Against Buddhist Skeptics (Part Two)

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

Mark Linsenmayer

Casey, Paskin, Philosophy, Linsenmayer, Society & Culture, Alwan

4.62.3K Ratings

🗓️ 12 August 2024

⏱️ 38 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Mark, Seth, and Dylan now turn to ch. 4 of Dasti/Phillips' Nyaya Sutra: Selections with Early Commentaries about the self. Buddhism famously claims that there is no self, and the Nyaya philosophers respond with both common-sensical arguments (e.g. psychological properties must be possessed by something) and religious (without a soul, what persists through reincarnation?).

Get more at partiallyexaminedlife.com. Visit partiallyexaminedlife.com/support to get ad-free episodes and bonus content including a supporter-exclusive part three to this discussion. Listen to a preview.

Sponsor: Give online therapy a try at BetterHelp.com/partially and get 10% off your first month.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

You are listening to the partially examined life episode 347 part two recorded on a completely different day than part one,

0:15.8

with not quite the same group of people.

0:17.8

We're going to talk more about the Nyaya Sutra.

0:20.3

We read Chapter 4 on Self this time.

0:24.7

This is Mark Litzenmeyer existing only for an instant, but leaving traces for eternity.

0:32.4

This is Seth Paskin experiencing whatever it is that Mark is experiencing in Austin, Texas.

0:39.0

This is Dylan Casey capable of cognizing anything in Madison, Wisconsin.

0:43.6

All right, let's get down to it.

0:45.1

It's the self, we get to apply the methodological things

0:48.8

from chapters one and two.

0:49.9

Two was more about methodology,

0:51.3

and we didn't really talk about two so maybe we can

0:52.9

bring in I don't know at least we see the Tarka in action which I mentioned before so

0:57.8

this is at least argument by elimination yes so when something is

1:02.0

actually being challenged, right?

1:04.6

We assume epismologically that if something seems to be supported by one of the

1:09.2

knowledge sources, then we can just slot it in is, that's knowledge knowledge baby and we can build our towering edifice of science on that

1:16.6

But as soon as somebody actually has a live issue with what we're arguing about then we have to bring in some sort of more sophisticated

1:25.6

argumentation and not just rely on the first knowledge source.

1:28.8

So as Seth was just saying, okay, well we got two options now, mostly it's just going to be I want to

1:33.6

eliminate the other one I want to show that it's garbage and then mine that's still

1:37.6

remaining on its original evidence persists there or if you tried to knock down

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Mark Linsenmayer, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Mark Linsenmayer and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.