It's the partial exam in life episode 329 part 3. We're going to do a close reads here. We're doing

kirka guards the concept of irony from 1841 the conclusion.

Conclusion which is called irony as a controlled element of the truth of

irony. It is page 324 in the text.

Start us off, Wes.

It has already been pointed out in the foregoing that in his lectures on aesthetics,

Solger makes irony to condition for every artistic work.

When we now in this context say that the poet must be related ironically to his writing,

this means something different from what was said about this earlier.

Shakespeare has frequently been eulogized as the Grand Master of Irony,

and there can be no doubt that there is justification for that.

But by no means does Shakespeare allow the substantive worth to evaporate into an ever more fugitive supplement.

And as for the occasional culmination of his lyrics in madness, there is an extraordinary degree of objectivity in this madness.

When Shakespeare is related ironically to what he writes, it is precisely in order to let the objective dominate.

Irony is now everywhere present.

It sanctions every single line so that there will be neither too much nor too little.

In order that everything can have its due, in order that the true balance may be achieved

in the Yeah, we're being dropped in and we don't care about who soldier is. He's a he's another playwright. I mean it's it's what is being quoted that's important.

Ironies necessary for every kind of art. I just want to say this is like the clearest thing I've ever read by

Kircherd and also the most enjoyable. I think he's right in a way, well to the extent that I understand him so Shakespeare is

eulogized as the grand master of irony but what is his the extraordinary degree of

objectivity that that's what makes the irony good as

...