Okie dokie. I apologize for beginning the show by saying okie dokie, but we can't go back now.

We can't undo it. It happened. And we now both have to live with that.

All right, so moving past it, what's the latest fake stupid controversy that we can waste our time

talking about? For that, we go to Ken Kuchinelli, who is one of the one of Trump's top immigration

officials, a little background here. Before we get to the to the fake stupid controversy,

a little background, recently it was announced, in the past couple of days, it was announced by

the Trump administration that they would be taking steps to better enforce public charge policies.

Now, these are policies that Trump did not invent. They don't originate with him.

Nobody in the administration came up with this. These are policies that have existed in some

former and other for 100 years. It's just that they haven't been enforced very well or at all.

And what the Trump administration is saying is, hey, let's actually enforce these laws. The idea

behind public charge policies is that we don't generally want to accept immigrants into the country

even legally, who are likely to be on public assistance. In other words, we don't want to bring

people here just so that they can live off of the taxpayers who are already living here. Why don't

we want that? Well, because we can't afford it for one thing. Our nation is already famously

in a lot of debt. And we just we can't keep adding to it. At a certain point, you have to cut it off.

And it's not fair to the taxpayers. The taxpayers have their own families to take care of first and

foremost. And so to keep adding more and more people from all across the world, say, yeah, take care

of them too. And them and them. And then, as I said, we got to cut it off somewhere. And there's

no real benefits to the nation or to society, to our society. Immigration should not be a one-way

street. It's always been the idea has always been you benefit because you get to come here and we

benefit because because you come here, it should be a two-way beneficial arrangement. And it's not

...