Hey guys, welcome to Relatable. Happy Wednesday. I hope everyone has had a wonderful

week so far and that you enjoyed Monday's episode with my two friends, Virgil Walker

and Darryl Harrison from the Just Thinking Podcast. A lot of you reached out to me saying

how much you appreciated the interview and just the insight that they gave. I highly

recommend checking out the episode. If you haven't already today, I actually have another

interview. So I have a lot of interviews lined up because we're talking about topics that

I am very interested in getting other people's insight on you guys know that I love to do

my monologues and I love to give my analysis and of course I'm going to do that. But there

are a lot of experts out there on the subjects that we are discussing that I think offer

better and closer insight into the issues that we are discussing. Today we are going

to discuss the Supreme Court case early, the set of cases under the one name, a Boastock

versus Clayton County that have to do with discrimination in the workplace based on

sexual orientation and so-called gender identity that was decided on Monday. A conservative

justice gorsuch actually wrote the majority opinion. It was a six three decision saying

that the 1964 Civil Rights Act that said that you cannot discriminate in the workplace based

on sex also applies to sexual orientation and so-called gender identity. And of course

this is not the decision that contextualists that traditionalists when it comes to constitutional

interpretation wanted not just because of the interpretation itself but the principle

and the nature of legislating from the bench. That's what we're going to discuss today

and I am going to discuss that with Keri Severino of the Judicial Crisis Network. She

follows the Supreme Court closely and she has an interest and it brings awareness to the

decisions that the court makes and has an interest in justices that follow the Constitution.

...