meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

Ep. 259: Locke Clarifies Misleading Complex Ideas (Part One)

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

Mark Linsenmayer

Casey, Paskin, Philosophy, Linsenmayer, Society & Culture, Alwan

4.62.3K Ratings

🗓️ 28 December 2020

⏱️ 42 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

On Book II (ch. 22-33) of John Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689).

Simple ideas get complex quickly when you put them into words, and can give rise to various philosophical problems that are either easily cleared up when you figure out how the complex idea is built out of simple ideas, or if they can't be so broken down, then we really don't know what we're talking about and should just shut up.

Don't wait for part two, get the ad-free Citizen Edition now. Please support PEL!

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

You're listening to the Partially examined Life, a podcast by some guys who are at one

0:11.3

point set on doing philosophy for a living, but then thought better of it.

0:14.8

Our question for episode 259 is something like, what are complex ideas and how can they

0:19.9

go wrong?

0:20.9

We're reading the second half of book two of John Locke's Unessing Concerned Human

0:24.9

Understanding from 1689. More information please visit partiallyexaminedlife.com. This

0:30.0

is Mark Linson-Mirror Complex yet not conceptually confusing in Madison, Wisconsin.

0:34.6

This is Wes Alwin attempting to enumerate all my constituent ideas and Cambridge Massachusetts.

0:41.4

This is Dylan Casey furnished with a great number of simple ideas conveyed in by my senses

0:46.2

fit for my simple turn of mind in Madison, Wisconsin.

0:50.2

I like that simple turn of mind. You're feeling the Seth, usually self-assigned role. Trying

0:57.1

to double dip.

0:58.5

Seth being out today, I think we should raise alarm among our listeners that his wife

1:02.7

was exposed. Doesn't necessarily have COVID, but was exposed. And so there's a whole internal,

1:08.4

basically he's taking care of his child. But that is why we have no Seth and why we probably

1:12.5

should not do a full on Part 4 of this because he's Miss Part 3. You can't have somebody

1:18.0

miss Part of it. I don't know. We can figure that out later. But man, book one, kind of manageable,

1:23.1

a nice little thing we could chew. Last time, somewhat bigger. We had to pick and choose a little.

1:28.0

This even just finishing book two, pretty sprawling. A lot of rabbit holes we could potentially

1:33.0

disappear down for a whole episode on free will, on personal identity, on substance. So I had

1:38.1

suggested we start more or less from the end of the book where he's talking about there's

1:42.5

like four different criteria and how ideas can go wrong.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Mark Linsenmayer, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Mark Linsenmayer and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.