You're going to Hi and welcome to episode 16 of Proof. To wrap up our first season, to send to Kevin and I, along with Dan the cameraman,

are here to answer some of your questions,

discuss what making this season was like for us,

and fill in some of the things that we learned while investigating

that didn't make it

onto the show. So we're the course of the podcast. We've heard the journey of the

bowlings of Amanda and Michael going from believing that Kane and Lee were guilty to now believing they're not. So that was a really

interesting journey to witness. And Susan, I was wondering for you personally, how have your feelings

about this case changed from when we first started

and to where we are today? It was a few years ago now that I first heard about this case and

from the first time I spoke to Lee, I knew something was wrong with the case.

I didn't have much material to go on for quite a while,

so what I had was mostly the appellate decision from 1999, which

verified a lot of what Lee was telling me. But beyond that, I had things Lee Clark was

explained by this case and going on his word,

I mean it sounded like a messed up situation.

But of course, until you see documents,

you never know what's really going on beneath the surface.

And then as we got more documents in the case

that verified everything we've been telling me,

I was very much certain that at a minimum,

the entire case, the entire fact scenario presented by the prosecution was wrong and quickly can to believe that Lee and Kane were very much innocent in this case

...