As abortion activists fire bomb pro-life offices and pregnancy centers in Wisconsin, in Oregon,

in Maryland, and elsewhere around the country, the White House is continuing to insist that the

pro-abortion protests have been peaceful and should continue even when they take place at judges'

homes. So I know that there's an outrage right now, I guess, about protests that have been

peaceful to date, and we certainly continue to encourage that outside of judges' homes, and that's

the president's position. I actually cannot quite believe what she is saying here. Is Jen Sockie

saying that the White House is encouraging the protests outside the Supreme Court Justice's homes,

meaning the protests that are occurring at those homes? Or is she saying that the White House is

encouraging protests outside of, meaning other than, or except for, the ones at the judges' homes?

I hope it's the latter. I've been trying to figure out how to make it be the latter,

but I just don't think it is. I don't think it is because the other day when Sockie was asked

directly about the very same protests, she refused to condemn them. She said that she doesn't have an

official government position on where people protest. I don't think she is saying except for the

judges' homes because today she's still pretending that the pro-abortion protests are peaceful,

despite the graffiti and the arson around the country, despite the shrieking mobs outside of

the Justice's homes where their children sleep. I don't think that it's the latter. I don't think

she's saying don't go to the judges' homes because the protests at judges' homes to influence their

decision in this case are in violation of federal law, and the White House won't say anything about

that. I don't believe that Gen Sockie is condemning these protests because when BLM was burning the

country down, senior officials in this administration were raising money to bail out the rioters.

The left is right about one thing in this whole mess. They are right that we are witnessing a

constitutional crisis, not because the Supreme Court might overrule a terrible decision from the

...