On this week's Bet the Process podcast, we have Seth Burn on, which is, I would say,

as an understatement, an enlightening experience for us.

And we talk politics and we talk about why Rufus and I are both net negatives for the

sports betting media landscape or sports betting industry broadly.

And yeah, it's an interesting experience.

And with that, let's start the process. Bet, bet, bet, bet the process. Welcome to the podcast.

Bet the process. It's not the typical cookie cutter nonsense. If you came just for picks, you're in the wrong place. Find a town with the narrative to make a strong case. Instead of blindly assuming a team must be tanking. We're looking for the edge of messy body rankings. Crunching all the numbers in a simulator system that break down the data

analytically driven media coverage and sports gambling is pathetic the bottom

mind welcome to this week's bet the process podcast rufus and i are about to have seth burn on

and we actually already had him on so we kind of know what's going to be said so we want to prepare

you a little bit before that we we talk a little bit about elections and his election picks,

and that's why we wanted to have him on. He had a different agenda, which was kind of

calling us out on some specific things that come out of the Seaville world of gambling.

The reactions that I have, honestly, is this isn't something that I've really thought

about in a long time. And he would probably say that's a big problem by me because I haven't

thought about it. And it was really about the relationship that we have with different people in

an industry who may have once sold

picks or may sell picks. And it's a nuanced discussion, right, a very nuanced discussion

where he calls us out on a bunch of things. And like I think if you have someone like Seth on,

you have to be prepared for that. I don't think I was prepared for it And like I think if you have someone like Seth on, you have to be prepared for

that. I don't think I was prepared for it, but I think it was fine to have that discussion.

I think that, you know, we approach it from two completely different, you know, standpoint,

...