meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Effectively Wild: A FanGraphs Baseball Podcast

Effectively Wild Episode 280: Is Billy Hamilton Worth a Roster Spot?/Five Free Agents Finishing Make-or-Break Years

Effectively Wild: A FanGraphs Baseball Podcast

Ben Lindbergh, Meg Rowley

Sports, Baseball

4.72.7K Ratings

🗓️ 5 September 2013

⏱️ 37 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Ben and Sam discuss the debatable value of Billy Hamilton, then forecast the free agencies of Jacoby Ellsbury, Brian McCann, Phil Hughes and others.

Source

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Good morning and welcome to episode 280 of Effectively Wild, the Daily Podcast from

0:26.5

Baseball Prospectus. I am Ben Lindbergh joined by Sam Miller. Hello Sam. Howdy. How are you? Good. Would

0:35.6

you like to discuss anything before we discuss things? 280 was always like the line where a hitter

0:45.4

became a good hitter. Not a great hitter, a great hitter at 300, but 280 was a good hitter.

0:52.6

Is that mean we have become a good podcast? It's a counting stat, not a rate stat thing. What we're doing here. That's true.

1:01.3

Okay. Well, I don't have much to say. I was thinking earlier that it's strange how impossible to find

1:09.1

minor league postseason stats it is. Has that ever occurred to you? When you look up a

1:14.5

player's stats on Baseball reference, his postseason stats are not included. In the minors,

1:21.1

there's no section for postseason stats like there is for major league guys. There's pretty much no

1:27.5

source. There's like a private portal where you can look up MLLB stats and even there, it's kind of

1:33.9

hard to find. It's like it never happened. So they don't get wrapped into their regular stats. No,

1:38.7

they don't. Yeah, it occurred to me earlier to wonder whether that was the case and no, they don't.

1:43.5

It's like they just disappear. We have no way to know who's clutch in the minor leagues.

1:49.4

Would you rather, if you were, I mean, if you were, for instance, the editor of a site that kept

1:54.1

track of stats, for instance, if that were a thing that happened, would you rather see the stats

1:59.6

be their own separate line? Or would you rather see them just wrapped in unmentioned as part of

2:05.6

the overall line? I think for a minor league, I might be okay with it just being in the regular

2:14.3

season line. I don't know. Maybe that might be, well, I don't know. Maybe it's deceptive when

2:21.4

you look and see that a guy played more games than someone else and more games than were scheduled

2:26.9

for his team. I guess it could be confusing. Really? I don't know. I don't know. I can't, I don't

2:32.3

see any downside of that. I'm not totally against the idea of having that be the case in the majors.

2:39.8

I'm not necessarily, I don't think I'm for it, but I'm not totally against it.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Ben Lindbergh, Meg Rowley, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Ben Lindbergh, Meg Rowley and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.