meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Effectively Wild: A FanGraphs Baseball Podcast

Effectively Wild Episode 1041: The Fernando Rodney Dinner Date

Effectively Wild: A FanGraphs Baseball Podcast

Ben Lindbergh, Meg Rowley

Sports, Baseball

4.82.6K Ratings

🗓️ 6 April 2017

⏱️ 57 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Ben Lindbergh and Jeff Sullivan banter about Jake Arrieta’s velocity loss, the league’s artificial velocity gain, and whether the Astros won the winter, then answer listener emails about topspin and the turf, the Mariners’ and Blue Jays’ 40th anniversaries/seasons, disagreeing with projections, intentional-walk predictions, Madison Bumgarner’s batting, the negative value of player mistakes, single-game double-play […]

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

I'm confident in you, I'm confident in you, I'm confident in you, I'm confident in a high-speed

0:15.1

low and welcome to episode 1041 of Effectively Wild, a baseball podcast from Fangras presented

0:26.4

by our Patreon supporters. My name is Benlin Berg and I'm a writer for The Ringer.

0:31.0

Join us by Jeff Sullivan of Fangras. Hello, hello. So we were just talking about whether

0:36.5

we had any banter, we don't have a whole lot, but I just went to Fangras and saw the

0:41.8

two posts that you have published since I last emailed with you a few hours ago and the

0:47.6

last one is called What on Earth Happened with Jic Arietta, which is a question I'm interested

0:53.3

in. So what on Earth Happened with Jic Arietta? If you can summarize without making people

0:58.3

not want to read your post completely. Well, that's impossible because it's basically

1:01.9

one statistical point with 800 or a thousand words written around it, which is what most

1:06.7

of my posts are. I hope that didn't shatter any glass for people, but the point is basically

1:12.2

in the early going, we always get asked what is most important in the early going. What's

1:16.8

actually most important is that, hey, baseball is back and that's great and everything

1:20.7

we do is just gravy on top of that. But if you're looking for any actual significance,

1:25.6

then you're looking for things that stabilize very quickly. If you're looking for meaningful

1:30.8

numbers, nothing stabilizes faster aside from, I guess, one person's very existence than

1:36.2

how fast a picture throws. I think you would agree. Fastball of a loss extends to stabilize

1:41.0

after a sample size of, oh, I don't know, one. So we've seen a lot of pictures generating

1:46.7

sample size of one or more so far. Things are a little complicated right now for those

1:50.8

of us who play with the numbers because it turns out velocity readings are being recorded

1:55.4

differently this year. This was speed readings too. That's good callback. Yeah, we can keep

2:02.9

that up all season. That'll be fun. That's going to be the new Lenny Harris. If you would

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Ben Lindbergh, Meg Rowley, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Ben Lindbergh, Meg Rowley and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.