meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
In Our Time: Philosophy

Economic Rights

In Our Time: Philosophy

BBC

History

4.51.3K Ratings

🗓️ 27 January 2000

⏱️ 28 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss economic rights. Is democracy the truest conduit of capitalism, or do the forces that make us rich run counter to the democratic institutions that safeguard our rights? The economist Milton Friedman once said, “If freedom weren’t so economically efficient it wouldn’t stand a chance”. If that was ever true, is it still the case as we enter the era of the globalised economy? What is the relationship between democracy and capitalism? Is it possible for a country to get rich and stay rich without a liberal constitution and what is the prospect of the ever looming spectre of ‘globalised capital’ infringing human rights?With Professor Amartya Sen, Master of Trinity College, Cambridge and winner of the 1998 Nobel Prize in Economic Science; Will Hutton, former Editor of The Observer, Director of The Industrial Society and author of The State We’re In.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Thanks for down learning the In Our Time podcast. For more details about In Our Time and for our terms of use, please go to BBC.co.uk.

0:09.0

I hope you enjoy the program.

0:12.0

Hello, is Democracy the truest conduit of capitalism or do the forces that make us rich run

0:18.2

counter in the end to the democratic institutions that Is it's still the case as we enter the era of the globalized economy?

0:34.2

With me to discuss the relationship between democracy, human rights and the economy is the

0:37.8

Numbel Prize winner, Economist Amati Asan, who's master of Trinity College, Cambridge and author of Development as Freedom.

0:45.0

I'm also joined by Will Hutton, former editor of the Observer, a newly installed director of

0:49.1

industrial society. He invented the term stakeholder society in his book The State We're in.

0:55.7

Mathias said in the lectures you gave to the World Bank and the book that's come out of them

1:00.0

you take an evaluative approach which is distinct from traditional economic policy analysis.

1:06.0

What's your main objective to outline a new definition of poverty?

1:10.0

Well, it's not so much to redefine poverty. I think we know what poverty is, that we know that poverty consists of powerlessness, primarily the powerlessness to be able to feed oneself to get medical treatment, the kind of economic means that we need.

1:27.0

But powerlessness could take other forms too, not being able to express oneself, getting beaten up and attacked if I expresses a contrary view.

1:38.0

So it just takes the unfreatum, the lack of freedom which is really the underlying force the underlying

1:47.2

rationale behind thinking of poverty as low income is that broadening that I try to pursue. I wouldn't see it as redefining

1:57.0

poverty but really exploring the implications of taking a more evaluative view of poverty, understanding poverty in terms of its motivation

2:07.5

rather than just its symptoms.

2:09.9

Do you think this has its root in your view has its root in utilitarianism?

2:14.0

No, I would say that it's, I mean, utilitarianism concentrated on one kind of deprivation,

2:22.0

namely misery in terms of psychological inability to feel well, be

2:29.6

well, and so on.

2:31.1

But it's not an adequately broad view. I mean I think in some ways probably the

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from BBC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of BBC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.