meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Dunc'd On Basketball NBA Podcast

Eastern Conference Over/Unders 2025-26

Dunc'd On Basketball NBA Podcast

Nate Duncan

Sports

4.5 β€’ 3K Ratings

πŸ—“οΈ 6 October 2025

⏱️ 106 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Nate and Danny examine the over/under season win totals for the Eastern Conference.Β  Can Cleveland cruise to #1 again? How will Boston and Indiana respond to the losses of their best players? What about young midfield teams like Atlanta and Toronto? Can we make anything of the Sixers?Β  We pick over or under for all 15 teams in the East, then make our 5 best bets for the league as a whole. Washington Wizards β€” 0:30 Toronto Raptors β€” 10:09 Philadelphia 76ers β€” 17:22 Orlando Magic β€” 27:24 New York Knicks β€” 35:13 Milwaukee Bucks β€” 39:23 Miami Heat β€” 48:53 Indiana Pacers β€” 56:38 Detroit Pistons β€” 1:03:27 Cleveland Cavaliers β€” 1:11:30 Chicago Bulls β€” 1:15:11 Charlotte Hornets β€” 1:21:24 Brooklyn Nets β€” 1:28:40 Boston Celtics β€” 1:33:31 Atlanta Hawks β€” 1:37:36 Wrap-up and best bets–1:40:30

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Time now to discuss the Eastern Conference over under his Danny, and let's change things up a little bit.

0:06.6

I realize this when I looked at the timestamps for the West that we talked about the first team,

0:10.9

Dallas for like 11 minutes. Now, they are a very interesting team, but I don't think we went as long on any of the other teams.

0:16.3

Also, we're just kind of getting our footing, but it's nice to just start at the bottom of the alphabet and make sure that the Washington Wizards get some attention for the first and only time all season.

0:26.7

Let's begin with their overunders.

0:29.6

Over Under.

0:29.8

Last year, the Washington Wizards finished 18 and 64 with the differential of a 14 win team.

0:36.8

You can see some stuff on the tails of these sorts of things, of course.

0:39.9

And the over-under this year is set at 21.5.

0:44.8

Are they better or worse than last year in your review?

0:47.6

I think they're worse.

0:49.2

I mean, John and his great piece of The Athletic talked about how the three most effective players for the Wizards last year, you know, like in the minutes they played were Valanchunus, Poole, and Malcolm Brogden, and all of them are gone. That doesn't help. They do have these vets. Like, I mean, it's very possible that C.J. McCollum is better than some of those guys were last year. It's possible, of course, that Chris Middleton is. Marcus Martin isn't even on this team. He already got bought out and is a Laker. So that kind of thing on the talent in, talent out, I think they are probably a little bit worse, though you can make an argument that's close. I do think, though, remember, this is a team that not only had started the season

1:28.2

with four rookies, they actually played those guys meaningful minutes. Sarr and Bob Carrington,

1:34.4

most notably, though, of course, Tishon George had a big role too. And generally speaking,

1:39.7

the biggest jump that you see from players is your one to year two because the idea is basically

1:46.0

you and I talk about this in most improved player that there are a lot of adjustments that you

1:50.7

need to make to get into the NBA whether you come through the college system like Bub did or

1:54.6

you come through internationally like Alex Sar did and so year one isn't representative guys

2:00.2

just generally are a lot better. So the internal

2:03.8

improvement, just the passage of time, I think that helps them pretty significantly. But in terms

2:09.4

of like, are they better? If yes, not by much, if no, possibly. Yeah, I mean, Brogden didn't play

2:15.8

at all for them last year. Val Junis was moved before the deadline, and he was out there when they were so miserable.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Nate Duncan, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Nate Duncan and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright Β© Tapesearch 2026.