You're going to do. Well, greetings, welcome to the dividing line. We have a lot to cover today. It's a

stormy day here in Phoenix. I guess this is when we schedule winter in for two weeks because next week we are looking at and I'm hearing myself for some reason I'm not sure where that is. And we, next, I think by Monday, it's supposed to be 77 for a high here in Phoenix.

I just thought I'd mention that to those of you who are still shivering and

freezing wherever you're shivering and freezing at. It's it's gonna be nice here for

well. Anyway, last week sometime I encountered a video. I have not been able

to obtain videos from the founders thing on confessionalism yet.

I've only seen clips eventually when they're, you know, it's like G3 does too, you know, you have to wait for a couple months before stuff is actually available.

And so eventually we'll get around to it but we had seen advertised announced that Credo and Matthew Barrett and the classical theology guys.

By the way, everybody involved in these conversations

believes in and promotes classical theology. This is all a matter of emphasis, depth, and source.

What do you can emphasize? How far are you going to go, and what is the source from which

you're going to drive these things? These are what all the issues are about. And but classical theology is just simply that that's a term

that as far as I understand was coined by open theists in opposition

to the historical emphasis upon the immutability of God, God's unchanging nature, all the discussions of the various

omnis and imms and so on and so forth which of course open

theists deny these things they deny that God has for example exhaustive knowledge of

all future events.

They would limit God's knowledge to,

and I don't even know how they do this,

to be honest with you, at least consistently,

they limit God's knowledge of the future events to what he

himself is going to do. But if he interacts with man, how would he even know that?

...