meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Philosophy Bites

Donna Dickenson on Body Shopping

Philosophy Bites

Nigel Warburton

Education, Philosophy, Society & Culture

4.62K Ratings

🗓️ 25 May 2008

⏱️ 14 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Do you own your body? If not, who does? These are important questions in an age in which there is extensive trade in body parts. Donna Dickenson, author of Body Shopping, discusses this issue with Nigel Warburton in this episode of Philosophy Bites.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is philosophy bites with me David Edmonds and me Nigel War Burton.

0:07.0

Philosophy bites is available at

0:08.6

www philosophy bites.com.

0:11.2

Do we own our bodies? It sounds like an odd question, but it's linked to another

0:16.7

one. Do we have the right to sell our body parts? There's an urgency to such issues because of

0:22.2

the rise of the biotechnology industry.

0:25.3

Huge sums can be made by exploiting research based on body parts, human tissue, organs, eggs and

0:30.7

so on.

0:31.7

Corporations have made millions from patenting genes.

0:35.0

Donald Dickinson, author of body shopping, argues that the commodification of the body has gone too far.

0:42.0

John Dickinson, welcome to Philosophy Bites.

0:44.0

Thank you very much, Nigel. I'm really pleased to be here.

0:47.0

I'm very excited about your project.

0:48.0

Now, the topic we want to focus on today is the question,

0:52.0

who owns your body that's fairly obvious isn't

0:55.8

I own my body I was sort of hoping you would say that because in good philosophical

1:01.4

gadfly tradition I'm going to show you that no your preconception is wrong.

1:05.6

It's wrong in the common law because once tissue is taken from your body it doesn't belong to you anymore. It becomes what's known as

1:13.8

Ries Nulius, no one's thing. And that brings me into the second reason why it's wrong because

1:18.8

traditionally it didn't really matter whether tissue taken from your body belonged to you or not because there

1:24.6

was no financial value attached to it.

1:26.9

It was assumed that once you had the tissue taken out, it was taken out because it was

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Nigel Warburton, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Nigel Warburton and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.